| FTBL The Good, The Bad and The Ugly vs. Bayou Brian

I thought they learned their lesson from Tennessee and had a better signal system on snaps (guard watches for the leg and taps the center) rather than the center having to look or anyone trying to listen. I see that in the few NFL plays I see. It was awesome how the crowd was tamed and they had the whole second half or so with normal, audible calls.
 
Some great film study on the LSU game fromThe Film Guy. He is a uGA person, but does some of the best film study of games I've seen online in regards to offensive line play.

 
Last edited:
Do we think the attack from Saturday is sustainable, or is that even desired? I'm curious if this approach will carry over or if this was just a combination of opponent and weather.
It's something that is sustainable if the opponent has deficiency that are similar. I feel the staff took advantage of stuff they saw on film and the game played out to where they really didn't need to change our strategy due to LSU not making adjustments or the game just getting far enough away from LSU there was not need to risk passing the ball. Will that work vs aTm and aU... maybe, I don't know those teams enough to know if it will... but I would guess those teams will focus more on stopping the ground game and scheme we showed and make it more about our WR and QB air play. I'm not sure either team has that ability with their D, nor do I see either team as a team that can counter on offense to keep up the pace of scoring to make the game tactics change. Now, we do have the tendency to get in our own way with turnovers and penalties... so I think those are the two areas we need to control to be effective moving forward and if we do... we should be fine.
 
Do we think the attack from Saturday is sustainable, or is that even desired? I'm curious if this approach will carry over or if this was just a combination of opponent and weather.

In a word, yes, it is sustainable. Desired? Absolutely.

For this offense to run at its highest efficiency, the run game must be a strength... and I'm talking about going against SEC level opponents... Bama isn't going to run Milore 10 times this Saturday against Mercer. But, the emergence (finally) of a dynamic rushing attack has been a much needed and positive step. Against Vandy, South Carolina, and Tennessee, Bama averaged 2.8 yards per rush on 93 attempts. In the last 2 games against Mizzou and LSU, Bama has averaged 6.8 yards on 85 attempts. Now, there are a few different reasons for such, including the fact that the Vols and Gamecocks have high level edge players that made things difficult for Bama. Also, Milroe was limited physically for most all of those 3 games. Still, the improvement has been substantial. The OL is performing well, the play calling and play designs have been shaper (example, LSU's edges were stout too, but Bama schemed better to limit their impact), and Milroe has regained his quickness and burst. It all adds up to significant improvement.

I'll also break it down this way... Of Bama's 315 total rushing attempts this season, 175 have been either behind or off either left or right tackle. That is where Bama has had their most consistent success on the ground... they've averaged 6.27 yards to the left and 6.8 yards to the right. It's been difficult sledding up the middle in the A gaps, but overall, more success in the B gaps (especially on the left side). Law being back has helped on some perimeter runs. The TE's, Ouzts specifically, has been like having a bulldozer on the field at times (there's a reason we are seeing more 12 personnel).

Bottom line, there was a concerted effort going into the LSU game (and even the Mizzou game) to get this offense on track in terms of a physical rushing attack. I'd imagine the rainy forecast had something to do with it, but also, it was the needed course correction. It's about maximizing the potential of the offense and not putting too much on Milore's shoulders in the passing game.
 
Like Brandon said, you have to have a solid running game, to make good positive gains every run if possible.

On the same note, you have to be able to pass for good positive yardage when you do pass.

It's called having a balanced offense.

Also, the OC has to call the right play, as not to be predictable. To keep the defense guessing and off balance.

A given. Any play that works for good positive yards was a good play call. Any play that doesn't gain or loses yards, well, that would be a shitty play call. :poop:

Capt Obvious here.
 
I am concerned it is not sustainable. The biggest difference the last two games has been cleaning up penalties and Milroe getting healthy especially in the LSU game. OL has gotten better as well and certainly the defense has. The team is now dealing with a few more injuries.

Teams will try to find a way to put the game in Milroes hands through the passing game. Has the OL improved enough that the opposition is unable to do that? I would be concerned that Milroe running double digit attempts per game will get him banged up again. The Milroe playing healthy and fast like he did against LSU is a dangerous player. A hurt Milroe w/o the threat of his athleticism makes him average or at best inconsistent.
 
Back
Top Bottom