I get what you are saying, honestly I do. Everyone's situation is different. $2M is not what it used to be but it is still better than $0M. Now, from an NIL or collective perspective, I would like to see those agreements have some teeth. If you quit, sit out or transfer early, you should be responsible to pay some of that back. I just don't think it is as black and white as we try to argue. We have an emotional attachment to the program that took years, even decades to develop. Most 20 year olds are not going to have that same type of attachment. Also, when this time of year rolls around and some players have to have "the talk" with the coach, is it not fare to say when they are told to move elsewhere that that isn't the same breach of trust in reverse? We can't have it both ways.