This strikes me as funny. We're talking about a program in the depths of hell, and your interpretation of the head coach telling players they need to move on is a "go to hell" moment. (Wouldn't that be a lateral move?
) Players are encouraged to move on all the time; in every division, every program. This isn't a big deal: we all KNEW the UC roster was not good.
This strikes me as a little odd as well. Questioning trust of someone who blatantly tells other players the truth? "I'm changing the culture and you don't fit." How is that a bad look when you're talking about a program that's in horrible shape? Was it the phrasing that bothered you? Was it the transparency in public on how, and why, he was rebuilding the roster?
I'm baffled seeing him tell the world what he was going to do, do it, and now people are upset because he did what he said he was going to do.
Another ... "He wants to have the cream of the crop," BUT, "he has to earn it." And a 26-7 record as a head coach isn't a coach earning it? Hell, I didn't care for his persona in the pro's or at FSU for that matter: but those two periods in his life are also part of what he's earned and why he would want the cream of the crop.
2023, Deion, and Colorado.
The open at TCU. Oregon, Utah, and UCLA are three of their road games (WSU.) USC comes to won as does Arizona and OSU. (They have another OOC, a P5 school, but I can't think ...)
I suspect the O/U on total wins is going to be 3 to 3½. If I could play props (without driving to Cherokee) I'd take the under. It's
too much of a cultural shift, too quickly.