NickelDoubleDog
Member
Tim Keenan got mentioned by Saban as a DL playing well. Good to hear.
WhereHearing Buchner best for our system. Milroe good vs 2’s and bad vs 1’s.
Hearing Buchner best for our system. Milroe good vs 2’s and bad vs 1’s.
I'd be happy with him as the starter.I'd agree with that. Buchner has the lower ceiling of the 3, but he's more apt to do consistently well with what is asked and play within the system.
This pales in comparison with the DuBosian scandals of '99-'00: it lacks the racial elements the team was fighting at the time.I don't think I can recall another preseason where I've heard such drastic reports going one way or the other more than this year. I don't know what to think at this point.
Just my suggestion: don't try to think at this point, just remember.I don't know what to think at this point.
Flashes, hasn't been consistent, but has had a good camp. While mentioning Keenan he also pointed to a few other things. One he mentioned was passing lanes: that's not new. He mentioned mistakes they're making when they're stunting: that's not new either—they still aren't maintaining their role.Tim Keenan got mentioned by Saban as a DL playing well. Good to hear.
Glad to hear Keenan mentioned in a positive way.Tim Keenan got mentioned by Saban as a DL playing well. Good to hear.
This is what I was refering to aboive when n I said Saban was critical of the DL after the scrimmage. Sounds like a lot of the same issues we have had the last few years is still occurring. Maybe I had an unrealistic expectation those would get cleaned up quickly. I guess more realistic expectation would be improvement throughout the year.Flashes, hasn't been consistent, but has had a good camp. While mentioning Keenan he also pointed to a few other things. One he mentioned was passing lanes: that's not new. He mentioned mistakes they're making when they're stunting: that's not new either—they still aren't maintaining their role.
This pales in comparison with the DuBosian scandals of '99-'00: it lacks the racial elements the team was fighting at the time.
Not the reason I'm replying here ...
Just my suggestion: don't try to think at this point, just remember.
When they left spring camp what was said? Milroe looks to be #1 going into fall.
When fall camp started what was said? We looked for guys to separate, they haven't through the summer, we'll likely not have a solid answer on the QB position until game three, maybe game four.
Two guys I know sat together and watched the practice yesterday: both came away with different opinions. One was watching the WR's drops and wasn't paying attention to the QB's ball placement. The other was watching the QB all the time and not paying attention to a WR drop the ball.
They both could be right on the play and they both could be wrong on the play ... while neither knew what the play was in the first place.
This always happens after the second scrimmage of the fall.
You got my point. That was it.You'd have to tell me what those articles say. I don't care what Talty has to say: I've seen his spots. Tony?
I can say that's two guys that weren't there commenting on something they didn't see.
I see where you're coming from, i.e. getting the context of the play outside of just the drops, but these two are on the receivers since a drop implies they had it.What if they were rotating QBs in and out so much that there was not enough consistency and it was hard for them to find their rhythm?
What if they were putting Qbs in tough situations over and over to test their decision making and etc?
Right and like Terry said they weren't there.I see where you're coming from, i.e. getting the context of the play outside of just the drops, but these two are on the receivers since a drop implies they had it.
"They" weren't there?Right and like Terry said they weren't there.
Talty & Tsoukalas"They" weren't there?