Under Locksley's direction, we were a pass first team and pass first teams tend to be more finesse than power oriented. Bama has to honestly ask themselves this offseason if that didn't hurt our performance vs Georgia and Clemson and even the second half against Oklahoma. It felt like we were running as a change of pace and not because we wanted to and it felt at times we are just not stubborn enough about the run and tend to airmail it too much. That stuff tends to show up the closer we get to the better defenses and the better teams.
Power run teams run the ball because they can. That mentality builds toughness with the big uglies up front and against physical, likeminded teams can carry the day. In our big games, we need to control the clock and play field position better. Plus I would be more inclined to believe at this point that being more physical at the LOS is really what breaks defensive morale and not always points on a scoreboard.
There is a happy balance that it takes to be that kind of offense. Maybe with Tua, the temptation is just too strong to harness some of that passing creativity but Sark needs to give it a go. Lawd knows we got the studs to do it and frankly, nothing would slow down all those cheap shots Tua took last season than an in your face power run game. It might end up being the best gift we could give Tua in the long run.
Now, can Sark give us that?
"Saban Ball" is the term I used for the identity he "used" to win championships. It's basically having a dominant D and OL via running & pass pro. Last year I believe the OL could have gotten there, and could have implemented the ground game you speak of. But the D.... It wasn't the same as in championship years at any of the 3 levels, with the exception of Q dominating his match up most every game. So I think Saban's idea was to flat outscore people with Tua and the passing game... To use a basketball reference - shoot 3's instead of 2's. "Saban Ball" was beating you with 2's and great defense. Can't do that without a great defense
What did you think of our running game last year? Why would the 12th ranked defense in the country have to dictate how our offense would have to play football?
With the speed we scored 28 points vs Oklahoma we continued to immediately put our defense out there against Murray. I don't think he had a first down in the first quarter and I know we sacked him numerous times in that period of play. When should an offense be able to protect their defense with a physical time of possession drive? It's the age-old struggle of balance. I don't think it's a switch you can turn off and on, it's more a philosophy you come with each game.
But, don't get me wrong about the Clemson game. That I believe was something else, besides Xs and Os. That was a Bama team not ready to emotionally compete. I've seen it happen to other teams just a rarity for us.
I thought the running game was good not great... Mostly because as you've noted, the commitment wasn't there. The biggest reason I was excited about Tua was the idea of how our run game would be so productive and effecient with the threat of a deep passing game... But it never felt like we took full advantage of that. Not to mention having what appears to be the most underutilized first round RB talent in the history of CF.
But - The D absolutely plays into how the O is being approached. I too agree that the OU finish was somewhat head scratching, but trying to crawl inside Saban's head those last 2 games I think he really believed we just needed to outscore both of them.... Win shootouts. Half because of the D and half because he saw us do it all year on O... Like you said, we never really committed to the ground and pound theory.
Hoping that at some point we get back under center.... Tua should as well. Nothing like the RB with a full head of steam and the OL getting downhill, not to mention how deadly those play actions could be. But when the spread offenses starting scoring all these points I think Saban shifted into the run opening up the pass to the pass opening up the run... And as we've seen many times (OU game was the opposite), an early deficit has led to an evacuation of the run game... Seems to be an an Achilles heel.
I think that's pretty much it. As I mentioned, Locksley had his own priorities with the passing game, I hope Sark can find the power and realize that mismatches occur at running back as they do with wide receivers. I don't see Tua having any problem executing any style we chose to play.
You by chance know if Sark had the QB under center at USC/ATL?! Anyone?
I understand all the great things shotgun can do for a QB and the O in general... And the pistol is cool.... But damn, getting under center with some ass kickers could be a nice option.
I'd just be happy to see them use a bit more clock between snaps... regardless of run/pass. Don't get me wrong... I love scoring in 30 seconds... but I'd much rather see a 5 minute drive at leastand the coaching staff sucks as well... Players need to do their part on both sides of the ball. If your plan is to outsmart the opposition in every game then good luck. I do believe is going back to more of a meat and potatoes team with his staff hires.
We lost Levitre early which was painful for the running game as he was one of the better run blocking guards paired with losing Freeman at RB. Later Fusco was lost for the second half of the season which just compounded that issue. Oline is a such based on how well they work as a unit... losing one guy can be a big change; however, on the Defensive side of the ball we lost several pro-bowlers at key positions early.. it wasn't pretty on that side last year.@94 Grad didn't ATL suffer several OL injuries as well during the season? I know the defense suffered through a lot, but I believe they lost several OL during the season for extended periods of time as well.
Pretty sure I saw it mentioned somewhere about QBs already take simulated snaps from under center in first practice. I could be wrong, but pretty sure his offense at USC had the QB under center a fair amount.
We lost Levitre early which was painful for the running game as he was one of the better run blocking guards paired with losing Freeman at RB. Later Fusco was lost for the second half of the season which just compounded that issue. Oline is a such based on how well they work as a unit... losing one guy can be a big change; however, on the Defensive side of the ball we lost several pro-bowlers at key positions early.. it wasn't pretty on that side last year.
And what percentage of those told us to write Jalen off?I look forward to the REC members telling us how the scrimmages go this spring.
Sadly, I donāt think he is. Definitely better than back in the day; but if we canāt win 1 NC with Tua; hard to imagine one in next 2-3 years. Donāt think there will be any Jay Barkerās or even Jake Cokerās winning NCās in near future and todayās defense (no matter how dominant 2016), wonāt be the deciding factor.I hope Tua's brothers is within the same neighborhood talent wise as he is. If so then things should be pretty good for Bama at the QB spot. I look forward to the REC members telling us how the scrimmages go this spring.
But, we've already won 1 NC with Tua!Sadly, I donāt think he is. Definitely better than back in the day; but if we canāt win 1 NC with Tua; hard to imagine one in next 2-3 years. Donāt think there will be any Jay Barkerās or even Jake Cokerās winning NCās in near future and todayās defense (no matter how dominant 2016), wonāt be the deciding factor.