🌎 Man what the hell is happening in Montgomery?

 

[Brandon Van de Graaff]

If a large crowd of thugs wanting to fight me or my family..If I pull the gun, it will be used..they shouldn’t have came..

 

[24and7]

View attachment 25137

Nah.. don’t need Brandon Miller to bring my joint… it’s on me…

 

[Justneedme81]

The thugs from the river boat.. any questions

Who's the thug from the riverboat?

 

[24and7]

Who's the thug from the riverboat?

Why do u leave the “S”off?… the whole damn crew..

The whole crew decided to become vigilantes for “black vengeance “ or something… they better be prepared to DIE for it.. if they mess around with the wrong person..

 

[It Takes Eleven]

Why do u leave the “S”off?… the whole damn crew..

The whole crew decided to become vigilantes for “black vengeance “ or something… they better be prepared to DIE for it.. if they mess around with the wrong person..

There were thugs on the pontoon, too.

 

[24and7]

There were thugs on the pontoon, too.

The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..

 

[Justneedme81]

There were thugs on the pontoon, too.

You get it. I kept asking him which thugs were he talking about?

 

[Justneedme81]

The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..

The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.

 

[It Takes Eleven]

The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..

They were all out of control and acting individually. The boat won't be held liable for what their employees do, own their own, off the boat. Your view that some should've shown restraint when none were just shows a bias.

There's nothing good about this whole situation.

 

[24and7]

The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.

Yes the second fight was not a victim involved.. completely different people… a completely different fight… that was actually started by employees of the river boat.. the leaders of the river boat encouraged the second fight.. easy lawsuit.,

 

[24and7]

They were all out of control and acting individually. The boat won't be held liable for what their employees do, own their own, off the boat. Your view that some should've shown restraint when none were just shows a bias.

There's nothing good about this whole situation.

There should not have been a mob justice.. the police were coming… the parties were separated ..the boat let the crew off to go fight… even some supervisors..

 

[Justneedme81]

Yes the second fight was not a victim involved.. completely different people… a completely different fight… that was actually started by employees of the river boat.. the leaders of the river boat encouraged the second fight.. easy lawsuit.,

Did you ever link the second video ?

 

[24and7]

The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.

The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…

 

[24and7]

Did you ever link the second video ?

I sent the whole video from a news link up the page… it has video from both…

 

[It Takes Eleven]

The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…

You mean like the pontoon thugs ran to the first guy for a little vigilante justice?

 

[24and7]

You mean like the pontoon thugs ran to the first guy for a little vigilante justice?

No on the second fight it was a large crew of men they let off the riverboat… the guard was not involved in the second fight at all… the security guard was out of danger..several minutes afterwards…

 

[It Takes Eleven]

No on the second fight it was a large crew of men they let off the riverboat… the guard was not involved in the second fight at all… the security guard was out of danger..several minutes afterwards…

The first incident had guys ganging up on one guy. Both incidents involved people out of control, seeking violence.

 

[Justneedme81]

The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…

Crowd did protect him. I don't know what you were watching, but that's not it.

 

[24and7]

Crowd did protect him. I don't know what you were watching, but that's not it.

The second fight the mob combatants come off of the ship… the original fight was over.. the second fight was started after the fight had been broke up several minutes..

 

[24and7]

The first incident had guys ganging up on one guy. Both incidents involved people out of control, seeking violence.

Yes… the second fight was not needed… you had a mob of men NOT involved in the first one… they could have been some good witnesses.. they just wanted to attack those people on the pontoon boat..