🌎 Man what the hell is happening in Montgomery?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Justneedme81 said:
Who's the thug from the riverboat?
Click to expand...
Why do u leave the “S”off?… the whole damn crew..

The whole crew decided to become vigilantes for “black vengeance “ or something… they better be prepared to DIE for it.. if they mess around with the wrong person..
 
It Takes Eleven said:
There were thugs on the pontoon, too.
Click to expand...
The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..
 
24and7 said:
The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..
Click to expand...
The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.
 
24and7 said:
The point being… the ship should not have let their crew off to go break the law any further… the fight was over…The people on the pontoon now have a lawsuit.. That riverboat is liable for the second fight… it made things worse… what if the pontoon crew would’ve killed some of the crew, with a gun… then the captain may have been criminally liable… the second fight should’ve never happened… the cops would’ve handled the first fight investigation much easier then..
Click to expand...
They were all out of control and acting individually. The boat won't be held liable for what their employees do, own their own, off the boat. Your view that some should've shown restraint when none were just shows a bias.

There's nothing good about this whole situation.
 
Justneedme81 said:
The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.
Click to expand...
Yes the second fight was not a victim involved.. completely different people… a completely different fight… that was actually started by employees of the river boat.. the leaders of the river boat encouraged the second fight.. easy lawsuit.,
 
It Takes Eleven said:
They were all out of control and acting individually. The boat won't be held liable for what their employees do, own their own, off the boat. Your view that some should've shown restraint when none were just shows a bias.

There's nothing good about this whole situation.
Click to expand...
There should not have been a mob justice.. the police were coming… the parties were separated ..the boat let the crew off to go fight… even some supervisors..
 
24and7 said:
Yes the second fight was not a victim involved.. completely different people… a completely different fight… that was actually started by employees of the river boat.. the leaders of the river boat encouraged the second fight.. easy lawsuit.,
Click to expand...
Did you ever link the second video ?
 
Justneedme81 said:
The people on the pontoon have a lawsuit? the same one who got arrest warrants?

This goes back to the original point: Those "Thugs" should've never attacked security guard in the first place. People who came to the security guard's aid was not a thug. They protected him. The Security guard was outgunned.

If anything, The guys who attacked the security guard should be the one getting sued, and they will be sued by security guard among others.
Click to expand...
The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…
 
24and7 said:
The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…
Click to expand...
You mean like the pontoon thugs ran to the first guy for a little vigilante justice?

 
It Takes Eleven said:
You mean like the pontoon thugs ran to the first guy for a little vigilante justice?

Click to expand...

No on the second fight it was a large crew of men they let off the riverboat… the guard was not involved in the second fight at all… the security guard was out of danger..several minutes afterwards…
 
24and7 said:
No on the second fight it was a large crew of men they let off the riverboat… the guard was not involved in the second fight at all… the security guard was out of danger..several minutes afterwards…
Click to expand...
The first incident had guys ganging up on one guy. Both incidents involved people out of control, seeking violence.
 
24and7 said:
The security guard may sue…

But the crowd was not protecting him… he got away and the fight was over… the crew just wanted to beat the people up… for whatever reason didn’t matter… the fight was over.. the pontoon crew was on their boat… the riverboat crew ran to them for vigilante justice…
Click to expand...
Crowd did protect him. I don't know what you were watching, but that's not it.
 
It Takes Eleven said:
The first incident had guys ganging up on one guy. Both incidents involved people out of control, seeking violence.
Click to expand...
Yes… the second fight was not needed… you had a mob of men NOT involved in the first one… they could have been some good witnesses.. they just wanted to attack those people on the pontoon boat..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

sean
🧑‍🤝‍🧑 / 🏡 Things happening in my town
    • Like
Replies
4
Views
386
TerryP
TerryP
TerryP
🌎 The EU, Europen Union, certainly feeds my addiction for watching something whimsical.
Replies
0
Views
18
TerryP
TerryP
TerryP
💬 🎾 What the hell has the sport of professional tennis become?
Replies
3
Views
237
50+yeartidefan
50+yeartidefan
Brandon Van de Graaff
🌎 A firefight in Fallujah, I mean Montgomery, last night...
  • Brandon Van de Graaff
  • Our Lives
  • 14
  • 644
Replies
14
Views
644
24and7
24and7
rick4bama
🌎 Report: AJ McCarron to run for statewide office in Alabama in 2026
2
Replies
32
Views
899
Krimson
K
Back
Top Bottom