| CURRENT EVENTS Is it safe to say Trump just secured the nomination?

[24and7]

The The 9th Circuit has just said a “non violent felon” can retain firearm rights… And the Dems want all felons to vote for them

 

[TerryP]

A party can run on law and order, but have a felon as their candidate. A felon can’t own a firearm, but can have the nuclear codes. A convicted felon can’t vote, but can be on the ballot. Weird times

It's going to be overturned. It happens when prosecutors and judges don't follow the law.

 

[ElephantStomp]

It's going to be overturned. It happens when prosecutors and judges don't follow the law.

ah yes the terrible judicial system for poor Trump. Amazingly it’s only repubs saying this stupid shit, not non political legal experts, but the brilliant folks on Fox and his stupid followers

 

[footballer]

ah yes the terrible judicial system for poor Trump. Amazingly it’s only repubs saying this stupid shit, not non political legal experts, but the brilliant folks on Fox and his stupid followers

I wonder what Alan Dershowitz, democrat and Harvard law professor has to say.

 

[ElephantStomp]

I wonder what Alan Dershowitz, democrat and Harvard law professor has to say.

Oh shit one democrat agrees with y’all.

 

[TerryP]

Oh shit one democrat agrees with y’all.

You need to read more and stop watching whatever source you are getting your news from.

The only ones who don't realize what this is are those on the far left. Is that where you are headed?

Look at the law. Why do you avoid doing so?

 

[ElephantStomp]

You need to read more and stop watching whatever source you are getting your news from.

The only ones who don't realize what this is are those on the far left. Is that where you are headed?

Look at the law. Why do you avoid doing so?

According to NY law he falsified business records. Not sure why y’all are having such hard time understanding this?

 

[TerryP]

According to NY law he falsified business records. Not sure why y’all are having such hard time understanding this?

Because they have no jurisdiction over federal cases.

Name another case where that's been, "falsified records?" You can't.

A payment to a lawyer, under "legal fees," is not falsifying records. The reason they used the word "novel charge" is because...it doesn't exist.

Why won't you answer why they decided to make a misdemeanor charge a felony? With no felony cited in the case? Why won't you answer why by NY law a judge can't be participating in campaigns, but this one was? As IS his daughter, to the tune of millions.

The perversion of the judicial system is alive and well. We have judges motivated by hatred. Justice isn't blind any longer: and it's right before your eyes.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Because they have no jurisdiction over federal cases.

Name another case where that's been, "falsified records?" You can't.

A payment to a lawyer, under "legal fees," is not falsifying records. The reason they used the word "novel charge" is because...it doesn't exist.

Why won't you answer why they decided to make a misdemeanor charge a felony? With no felony cited in the case? Why won't you answer why by NY law a judge can't be participating in campaigns, but this one was? As IS his daughter, to the tune of millions.

The perversion of the judicial system is alive and well. We have judges motivated by hatred. Justice isn't blind any longer: and it's right before your eyes.

That’s very right of you! They didn’t try him federally, so having jurisdiction over federal anything makes no sense.

Ok, so they made up a law that he broke and a jury found him guilty…..right makes sense really.

Falsifying business records is a felony in NY, so there was no turning a misdemeanor into a felony, it’s a damn felony in NY to begin with, you know this shit is easy to find out right?

“The judge participated in campaigns” is right out of the right wing playbook since the verdict was reached.

“The perversion of the judicial system is alive and well” this is absolute bullshit and what makes it even worse is you’re smart enough to know it is. You’re still not grasping this little, tiny fact….a fucking jury found him guilty not the “judge motivated by hatred”, not his daughter, a JURY. It’s amazing to me y’all say the justice system is not blind and blah blah blah, but you’re only saying it now because it’s the right’s lord and savior, but I guarantee you the right doesn’t feel the same about black people that have been imprisoned for bullshit.

What was that you said when Roe was overturned? I’m having a tough time remembering….oh yeah “the will of the voters”…NY voters put the judge in that seat, so isn’t this the will of the voters? Same thing really except for now it’s something y’all disagree with

 

[64Tide]

BTW, the judge in the case is an acting judge. He is not even in the pool of 24 judges that would have been randomly assigned to this case. He was also “randomly” picked in the Steve Bannon case and another Trump case.

 

[24and7]

 

[ElephantStomp]

BTW, the judge in the case is an acting judge. He is not even in the pool of 24 judges that would have been randomly assigned to this case. He was also “randomly” picked in the Steve Bannon case and another Trump case.

And a different judge in another case against him is a Trump loyalist (Cannon in Florida), I’ll bet you don’t think there’s a bias there huh? Bet you don’t think she should recuse herself huh?

 

[64Tide]

Doesn’t matter to me one way or the other. They should be neutral and fair. Also don’t care that Biden was elected, if he got the votes. We all know that he didn’t get more legally counted votes than the brown clown.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Doesn’t matter to me one way or the other. They should be neutral and fair. Also don’t care that Biden was elected, if he got the votes. We all know that he didn’t get more legally counted votes than the brown clown.

So, a Trump loyalist will be neutral and fair?

Not sure what the election has to do with the convo, but he did get the votes, if more people vote that leads to more votes, simple math

 

[64Tide]

Legal votes not marked unverified ballots.

 

[footballer]

Oh shit one democrat agrees with y’all.

You really should do some REAL research. There are many dems who feel or think the way as Dershowitz, his views just happen to be probably the most significant.

 

[ElephantStomp]

You really should do some REAL research. There are many dems who feel or think the way as Dershowitz, his views just happen to be probably the most significant.

I don’t care what politicians and such think, a jury of his peers found him guilty

 

[TerryP]

Ok, so they made up a law that he broke and a jury found him guilty…..right makes sense really.

Falsifying business records is a felony in NY, so there was no turning a misdemeanor into a felony, it’s a damn felony in NY to begin with, you know this shit is easy to find out right?

What law? Cite it.

They didn't. Can you?

 

[TerryP]

I don’t care what politicians and such think, a jury of his peers found him guilty

Oh fuck. It's like getting a fair trial in Auburn when you poisoned the trees. Get real.

 

[TerryP]

And a different judge in another case against him is a Trump loyalist (Cannon in Florida), I’ll bet you don’t think there’s a bias there huh? Bet you don’t think she should recuse herself huh?

Here's where you should say, "oops."