It's going to be overturned. It happens when prosecutors and judges don't follow the law.A party can run on law and order, but have a felon as their candidate. A felon can’t own a firearm, but can have the nuclear codes. A convicted felon can’t vote, but can be on the ballot. Weird times
ah yes the terrible judicial system for poor Trump. Amazingly it’s only repubs saying this stupid shit, not non political legal experts, but the brilliant folks on Fox and his stupid followersIt's going to be overturned. It happens when prosecutors and judges don't follow the law.
I wonder what Alan Dershowitz, democrat and Harvard law professor has to say.ah yes the terrible judicial system for poor Trump. Amazingly it’s only repubs saying this stupid shit, not non political legal experts, but the brilliant folks on Fox and his stupid followers
I wonder what Alan Dershowitz, democrat and Harvard law professor has to say.
You need to read more and stop watching whatever source you are getting your news from.Oh shit one democrat agrees with y’all.
According to NY law he falsified business records. Not sure why y’all are having such hard time understanding this?You need to read more and stop watching whatever source you are getting your news from.
The only ones who don't realize what this is are those on the far left. Is that where you are headed?
Look at the law. Why do you avoid doing so?
Because they have no jurisdiction over federal cases.According to NY law he falsified business records. Not sure why y’all are having such hard time understanding this?
That’s very right of you! They didn’t try him federally, so having jurisdiction over federal anything makes no sense.Because they have no jurisdiction over federal cases.
Name another case where that's been, "falsified records?" You can't.
A payment to a lawyer, under "legal fees," is not falsifying records. The reason they used the word "novel charge" is because...it doesn't exist.
Why won't you answer why they decided to make a misdemeanor charge a felony? With no felony cited in the case? Why won't you answer why by NY law a judge can't be participating in campaigns, but this one was? As IS his daughter, to the tune of millions.
The perversion of the judicial system is alive and well. We have judges motivated by hatred. Justice isn't blind any longer: and it's right before your eyes.
And a different judge in another case against him is a Trump loyalist (Cannon in Florida), I’ll bet you don’t think there’s a bias there huh? Bet you don’t think she should recuse herself huh?BTW, the judge in the case is an acting judge. He is not even in the pool of 24 judges that would have been randomly assigned to this case. He was also “randomly” picked in the Steve Bannon case and another Trump case.
So, a Trump loyalist will be neutral and fair?Doesn’t matter to me one way or the other. They should be neutral and fair. Also don’t care that Biden was elected, if he got the votes. We all know that he didn’t get more legally counted votes than the brown clown.
Oh shit one democrat agrees with y’all.
I don’t care what politicians and such think, a jury of his peers found him guiltyYou really should do some REAL research. There are many dems who feel or think the way as Dershowitz, his views just happen to be probably the most significant.
What law? Cite it.Ok, so they made up a law that he broke and a jury found him guilty…..right makes sense really.
Falsifying business records is a felony in NY, so there was no turning a misdemeanor into a felony, it’s a damn felony in NY to begin with, you know this shit is easy to find out right?
Oh fuck. It's like getting a fair trial in Auburn when you poisoned the trees. Get real.I don’t care what politicians and such think, a jury of his peers found him guilty
Here's where you should say, "oops."And a different judge in another case against him is a Trump loyalist (Cannon in Florida), I’ll bet you don’t think there’s a bias there huh? Bet you don’t think she should recuse herself huh?