G
Guest
I say running game.
what say you? (O'Reilly)
what say you? (O'Reilly)
G
Guest
The ground game looked better. All 4 tailbacks really ran hard. I suspect that we were holding back a bit in the passing game, but we didn't throw down the filed much. Mostly it was underneath stuff.
GROUND GAME......AWESOME......
G
Guest
Ground game looked very good. I liked the way that all 4 backs seemed to play hard and hit the hole with their head on a swivel. Got to figure with Keith playing next week (I hope) we may see more of the air attack.
G
Guest
Both was equally impressive in my mind. However, it means a lot more to see the ground game going. Last year it was stalling from Game 1 on.
I totally agree that we didn't go very deep into the playbook on the passing game--which is a good thing.
I'd like to say our running game looked really strong, Glen Coffee impressed the hell out of me, but I really will have more positive things to say about both facets of the offense after Saturday against these 'dores.
Now, our return game (Arenas!) was spectacular and I think he will be a strong player for us this year.
I'd like to say our running game looked really strong, Glen Coffee impressed the hell out of me, but I really will have more positive things to say about both facets of the offense after Saturday against these 'dores.
Now, our return game (Arenas!) was spectacular and I think he will be a strong player for us this year.
ijijmijij said:
When you toss Lowe in with Arenas, we may have the best return duo this side of Faytextville...
G
Guest
Like the old football adage goes "1 of 3 things happens when you throw the ball and 2 of them are bad." I think against teams that we can run against, you're gonna see the run, and if we can pass, then we'll pass. If we can do both, then God help 'em.
