I think mostly they applied the rules. Now the SMU versus Bama debate they bowed down to the politics that was being thrown out there right after the SMU and Clemson game. As had been stated times by me an others, Bama didn't help their cause in that debate.
| FTBL 1st Round in '24, '25 CFP: The Playoffs - Games begin at noon: SMU v PSU, UC v TX, and UT vs OSU
- Thread starter Brandon Van de Graaff
- Start date
Do you know the SMU coach is from the Gus Bus coaching tree? Not a surpised he is awlful just like Gus...
Scrape&Search1032
Member
I was one of them to that said this, we gave them leeway in making this decision.... and they did. However, looking at each teams SOS, and who they beat, SMU has no business being in this thing. Two best teams they played this season were losses.... not to mention what's happening right now as well. Penn State is making them look like complete idiots right now.
Scrape&Search1032
Member
This is why I say change who can be on the committee, look up some of the people from this year's committee. They have no business being there, and being able to make decisions.
Kamikazi18627
Member
I get it. You are right. Qb is a hard position to play. The hardest IMO
In all fairness when Milroe took the reins Bama had just gone through some of the best QB play that we have had in the history of the program. Even with that said, incosistent QB play is hard to overcome even with a great athlete. I am one that believes Milroe can become a very good QB in the NFL. The guy is a freak athlete and if he is able to focus just on football and his development, I think he will do some really good things in the NFL. Probably why he is still regarded highly in the draft because it can't be based on his on field performance this year. The great Milroe games he was unstoppable.
Screw the Viles and their fanbase. Hope they lose by 3+ touchdowns.
Scrape&Search1032
Member
And its not just Bama who has this argument over them. South Carolina and Ole Miss both have better cases to be in over SMU as well. I'm not an SEC homer whatsoever, but you can't sit there and tell me that what these three teams did this season doesn't warrant a CFP appearance. Especially over this SMU team, I don't give a shit what they're record is in that weak ass conference is.
Last edited:
Ain’t gonna happen.
Secondand26
Member
Let’s be honest - Penn St looks like shit also!
Scrape&Search1032
Member
Lol at that commentator defending the committee s decision.
Scrape&Search1032
Member
And still beating this shitty team by 28 points.
Secondand26
Member
“But it doesn’t take away from what SMU accomplished in the 1st 15 weeks “ - ESPN announcers. What a group of liberal, give everyone a trophy, dumbasses
The crazy thing about talking heads, they do not have to be right to get paid a lot of money. Same thing with meteorologists lol... I always said I needed their job because results really do not matter. Only thing talking heads get measured on is are you getting eyes to watch or people to click. This is why you have the Kanells and morons at al,com's saying and writing outlandish things so they can attract Bama haters,
The next time I listen to Kanell will be the first time and the next time I click on an al.com article will be the first time in a loooong time.
PurlJam
Member
One of them wasn't. He was talking about how you have to consider stregnth of schedule and how SMU didnt play Miami or Ga. Tech.
Scrape&Search1032
Member
I heard that to. But I was just baffled in the moment listening to the other guy.
Similar threads
- Article
