BamaFan334
Member
"Jonathan Allen was not a top 15 pick last year". No sh*t. He was injured.
He came back and played another year, played out of his mind, and still came out injured. He didn't help himself (IMO). EDIT - The debate is whether a healthy Jon Allen without the senior tape could have still gone top 17... I believe so. You obviously disagree.
The best thing you said is the NFL draft is a "gamble". This is exactly right. I don't know how you gamble, but when I gamble, I do the best to put the odds in my favor.
What does put the odds in your favor mean? If you don't play, you won't get injured playing. It's that simple. It's what McCaffrey did, it's what what Fournette did, just on a lower scale. Sitting out the 3 previous months is the same exact idea and makes the same exact sense - LIMIT THE ODDS OF LOSING. This could absolutely limit your chances of stock going up - But when you've got a lottery ticket in your hand it's not necessary.
Take the emotion out of the spectrum and it makes plenty of sense.
So you're saying Allen should have sat out his Junior year as well, then he may not have gotten injured an entered the draft after a healthy Sophomore season and one season layoff. And then if he did not have his monster Senior season they would have had nothing to go on to be a Top 17 pick, only a injury sustained Junior season leaving how much doubt as to his ceiling, health, or abilities?
Emotion is not part of this, you thinking you have any kind of odds in your favor when you gamble is the emotion being expressed. The chips are always stacked against you, trust me. And just because you simply have a 5% more chance of winning by playing a certain way, doesn't guarantee winning. Trust me, I gamble enough to know there are no real ways to defy the odds at a casino when playing against or even with the house, because we don't have enough money to sustain ourselves and they are never promised to flip in your favor. Poker is a different story since you play the man across from you. Any ordinary dumbass that thinks they gamble better than everyone else is clearly self-absorbed. I'm guessing you weren't part of the MIT students that ripped off Vegas, but even they said it wasn't gambling, so they knew the difference in knowing and gambling, because gambling makes for bad business.
We can go back and forth here all you want, but if you do not have tape, you will not be drafted high. Coaches want a history of good tape, minus quarterbacks obviously (Trubiskey was an awful pick) Any athlete will tell you they get nicked up playing sports and we all feel the residual of when we played. I'll take the health record of Johnathan Allen over another draftee being accused of rape or hitting a woman any day. The Redskins won out here and will get a killer player whereas all of the other teams needing a defensive lineman before the pick will miss out. There is a major human element to this, and it clearly shows every year with the Browns, Jets etc. and the long list of guys they miss on. Just goes to show it's all about perception, not all facts when it comes to the NFL Draft.