50+yeartidefan
Member
Let's consider this. What does South Carolina have to offer that he isn't' getting at Liberty? Money and facilities are all Liberty.
playing in sec....playing for championship.....lots...
Obviousl
Let's consider this. What does South Carolina have to offer that he isn't' getting at Liberty? Money and facilities are all Liberty.
I know you are comparing Liberty and I really do not know much about their program but if he went to OM why not? Is there really much difference in SC and what he had at OM? I guess OM does have more history but that was 50-60 years ago. Freeze would probably equal Spurriers success there. Personally I do not think he will go there but that is because I still think the SEC office will block it.Let's consider this. What does South Carolina have to offer that he isn't' getting at Liberty? Money and facilities are all Liberty.
playing in sec....playing for championship.....lots...
Obviousl
A few things I think need to be set aside here. One, this notion "it's in the SEC. It's playing for national championships." Sure, at some schools it does translate to a title shot. But, we're talking about UofSC here. They don't have "lots" to offer or we'd be seeing "lots" more talent there and we would have seen a lot more talent there.I know you are comparing Liberty and I really do not know much about their program but if he went to OM why not? Is there really much difference in SC and what he had at OM? I guess OM does have more history but that was 50-60 years ago. Freeze would probably equal Spurriers success there. Personally I do not think he will go there but that is because I still think the SEC office will block it.
Let's consider this. What does South Carolina have to offer that he isn't' getting at Liberty?
A few things I think need to be set aside here. One, this notion "it's in the SEC. It's playing for national championships." Sure, at some schools it does translate to a title shot. But, we're talking about UofSC here.
In my opinion, if he indeed wants back in the SEC, he'll wait until Pruitt is fired and he gets a shot at the job he has wanted for a lifetime.
reallly...USCe has no shot at NCs or SECchampionship?
Doesnt take but couple recruiting classes and get tha "Cam/Burrow.." QB
its not the blue bloods of sec. But......
you kidding.....Tennessee.....shit thats why we want him at USCe.....not TN...orAU
Having TN ground in dirt is the most greatest thing
reallly...USCe has no shot at NCs or SECchampionship?
Doesnt take but couple recruiting classes and get tha "Cam/Burrow.." QB
You're missing the point here. Your comments are about what you think Freeze should do, or where he should coach, without any regard to what Freeze wants to do or where he wants to coach.you kidding.....Tennessee.....shit thats why we want him at USCe.....not TN...orAU
Having TN ground in dirt is the most greatest thing
If you're Michigan and we're just separating this to "on the field" how does this differ from Rich Rod?Michigan is a dumpster fire under Harbaugh. I think this is his last season there. Michigan has money and the facilities. About the only strong competition in the Big 10 is Ohio State. First and foremost, Michigan is not in the SEC, where he would have to go through Sankey to coach. I believe Michigan will get him.
If you're Michigan and we're just separating this to "on the field" how does this differ from Rich Rod?
It'll take another two years of great recruiting classes to get that team where a guy like Freeze could do well. It's been a problem with all pieces fitting together at the right time. Take last year where they had a pretty good offensive line but struggled at the skill positions. This season they've got a few skill players but issues on the line they have to address.Not much different. Culturally, it's a very odd fit. I guess the only thing better is that Michigan is running a semblance of a spread offense now under Gattis, and presumably has recruited to it for a couple cycles. In 2008, they had only pro style recruits trying to shoe-horn into an offense RRod had and nobody fit.
Not much different. Culturally, it's a very odd fit. I guess the only thing better is that Michigan is running a semblance of a spread offense now under Gattis, and presumably has recruited to it for a couple cycles. In 2008, they had only pro style recruits trying to shoe-horn into an offense RRod had and nobody fit.
It'll take another two years of great recruiting classes to get that team where a guy like Freeze could do well. It's been a problem with all pieces fitting together at the right time. Take last year where they had a pretty good offensive line but struggled at the skill positions. This season they've got a few skill players but issues on the line they have to address.
It my view that it's an odd fit as well; culturally. Considering what I know of their fan base, how they've acted towards fans across the south, I'd dare say they look at Hugh as a hayseed (no offense to the Nix's.)
Watching their game against Wisconsin and this very statement was made! "Name a well known or very good back to come out of Michigan recently!" Crickets!!!but they don't have any Wheatleys or Biakabutukas at RB,
Watching their game against Wisconsin and this very statement was made! "Name a well known or very good back to come out of Michigan recently!" Crickets!!!
TerryP, this is what I wonder about South Carolina. They don't have ANY football tradition. Until the few years under Spurrier, they had only ONE 10 win season in their history. This is where coaches go to ..... retire. Even Spurrier's career ended on a rough note at SC. Remember, I stated that they want him badly, I didn't say that they had anything to offer (except a larger than life challenge).>> What does South Carolina have to offer <<<