playing in sec....playing for championship.....lots...
Obviousl
I know you are comparing Liberty and I really do not know much about their program but if he went to OM why not? Is there really much difference in SC and what he had at OM? I guess OM does have more history but that was 50-60 years ago. Freeze would probably equal Spurriers success there. Personally I do not think he will go there but that is because I still think the SEC office will block it.
A few things I think need to be set aside here. One, this notion "it's in the SEC. It's playing for national championships." Sure, at some schools it does translate to a title shot. But, we're talking about UofSC here. They don't have "lots" to offer or we'd be seeing "lots" more talent there and we would have seen a lot more talent there.
There is a difference between Liberty and UofSC: the same applies to Ole Miss to a degree. Going back to my earlier post:
Let's consider this. What does South Carolina have to offer that he isn't' getting at Liberty?
Facilities. We know how they affect a program both from recruiting and how well a team is built, physically. Liberty, hands down, is in better shape than UofSC.
Money. Last season Freeze received a new contract putting him in the top ten for non P-5 coaches. He just received what's reported to be a large raise. He's making more now than coaches in the SEC.
Next season? Look at their rosters. Liberty is in far better shape heading into 2021-22 than UofSC: especially at the QB position which is KEY with Freeze and his offense.
Like you
@mando , I don't see Freeze headed to 'Cola. It has more to do with what UofSC is today, now, than it does with what they might be. I get your Spurrier reference here but let's consider this along with that.
In the last of his 11 win seasons Spurrier was facing an eight win UGA team with UT and UF having worse records. The teams they beat that season out of the East with "good records" included a nine win Vandy and a 12 win Missouri: both teams we've seen a lot of fans say "they don't belong in the SEC." Spurrier had a good run in Columbia largely because of what a lot of Bama fans were complaining about: teams like Missouri winning the east because that side of the conference was down. (2012 being his best season.)
A pertinent question here. Why did Ole Miss hire Freeze? How much of it was due to knowing how he'd recruit? Remember, he was an Assistant Athletic Director for football external affairs all the while Orgeron was recruiting in the manner he was. How does a high school coach get an athletic director job? How similar is this to LSU hiring one of their own when the NCAA shit hit the fan? My answer, they knew what they were getting. (Hell, they knew what they were getting when they hired him as HC at Ole Miss. They didn't forget the accusations of Freeze having engaged in inappropriate conduct with female students while at Briarcrest. They ignored those stories only to find out about his "activities" when a reporter found out through FOIA requests for cell records.
As another question just to close this series of thoughts out.
Why would UofSC hire a guy who has been found to being playing around with the "hand tug gang," and also has been accused of sexual improprieties with high school girls?
If they go the Freeze route, more power to them. If he chooses to take the UofSC job it'll serve as a stepping stone. In fact, I'd dare say he'd be taking a step back from where he was at Ole Miss in pay, talent, and facilities.
In my opinion, if he indeed wants back in the SEC, he'll wait until Pruitt is fired and he gets a shot at the job he has wanted for a lifetime.