Reason and logic has always pointed towards It takes time. Said that from day one..
So many pieces to this pie...
You and I have discussed, on a number of times, how we need to separate the Saban era because the game of football had changed. In 2015, "basketball on grass" wasn't the same joke it was in 2011. When it comes to how the game is played today we've seen DeBoer adapt: his record proves this.
We hit Chapter Two several years ago with the transfer portal. In hindsight, it was only a problem for teams that were competing for the best bowl games and the playoffs (time recruiting replacements.) Overall, it went fairly smoothly. It certainly created parity among the top programs.
With the current staff, Chapter two is a great read. The recruiting has been top-notch and they've brought in some good players through the portal while maintaining the roster. (It's easy to forget DeBoer took over the program with the 85 and that January he had about half of that.)
In my book we're now into Chapter three: the NIL. Except, this chapter is no where near its conclusion. I mentioned his vision for the program. The overall picture isn't finished making it impossible to know the end result of his own vision.
More importantly, these kids have no idea what the final result is going to be. They spent their later, formative years of high school in a world full of inconsistencies. I find it no surprise to see it play out in other areas (though that FSU game is still inexplicable.)
On a different note, but somewhat related...
The additions to the SEC and schedules have made winning 10 games in a season a benchmark again. With 12, and schedules like we saw with some teams, it meant little to nothing. That changed.
The same applies here, IMO. No longer can people get a realistic grasp of how a coach will do in two seasons; three may be too short with the portal and ever changing compensations.