🏀 The @tuscaloosanews has learned how much funding Alabama men’s basketball receives from the House settlement share.



What is the payroll for the Alabama basketball roster now that schools are paying players?

Sources close to the program told the Tuscaloosa News that Alabama’s revenue share contribution to men’s basketball totals out to approximately 14% of the $20.5 million per year now required to be paid to athletes at major-conference schools under the terms of the landmark House v. NCAA lawsuit settlement.

This means Alabama men’s basketball players are splitting approximately $2.9 million in funds from the school. The school does not disclose what each player makes out of that.

This figure does not include name, image and likeness (NIL) deals that players can also make to enhance their compensation through the school's Yea Alabama collective or from deals made outside the collective.

Alabama has not disclosed how much of the House settlement money is allocated to each sport. Football, naturally, gets the largest portion.

Alabama has also invested in an under-construction multimillion-dollar basketball practice facility and in coach Nate Oats. His latest deal with UA, approved in March 2024 in the year the coach took the Crimson Tide to its first Final Four, paid $5 million in the first year and grows to $7.55 million in the final year. That contract carries into March 2030.

Approved in the summer of 2024, the House v. NCAAsettlement marked the formal start of revenue sharing between schools and athletes, ending decades of the NCAA’s amateurism model. The settlement requires major-conference schools to directly share a portion of athletic revenue with athletes while also creating a damages fund to compensate former athletes who were not allowed to earn money while playing under previous rules.

Under the new model, schools can distribute up to a capped amount annually — roughly $20.5 million in the current school year and rising to approximately $32.9 million by 2034-35 — to athletes across their athletic departments. The agreement also reshaped roster limits and scholarship structures, signaling a shift toward a more professionalized college sports landscape under the umbrella of the NCAA.

Alabama athletics director Greg Byrne told The Tuscaloosa News this past August that Alabama works with coaches – and, in football, with general manager Courtney Morgan – to assess the market for players in sports that are receiving House settlement funds to determine how much is spent on each player.

He noted that Alabama has structured its allocation of settlement funds based on revenue generated by each sport. Six Crimson Tide sports teams receive shares while 15 do not, according to Byrne.

Byrne also said Alabama has added “approximately 42 scholarships" across multiple sports. Those scholarships are distributed based on Title IX guidelines.

“Some schools have been more aggressive than us,” Byrne said. “If you asked every single coach, they'd want rev share, and understandably.

“We just do our very best to structure it the way we think that gives us the best opportunity to remain competitive across the board as a department.”
 

The College Sports Commission has rejected nearly $15 million in name, image and likeness agreements since it started evaluating them over the summer, representing more than 10% of the value of all the deals it has analyzed and closed.

The CSC released its latest statistics Monday, saying it did not clear 524 deals worth $14.94 million, while clearing 17,321 worth $127.21 million. All the data was current as of Jan. 1.

The numbers came against the backdrop of a "reminder" memo the commission sent to athletic directors last week, citing "serious concerns" about contracts being offered to athletes before they had been cleared through the commission's NIL Go platform.

The CSC is in charge of evaluating all deals worth more than $600 that are offered by third-party businesses that are often affiliated with the schools recruiting the players.

"Without prejudging any particular deal, the CSC has serious concerns about some of the deal terms being contemplated and the consequences of those deals for the parties involved," the Friday night memo said.
 
Waking Up Funeral GIF








Last year Cal's team bounced Pitino's St. John's club in the second round. I use Arkansas as an example here because I believe we'll all agree they can easily "fund" a basketball team for Cal. (You can say "a team a coach can field" in football. Can you say "a team a coach can court?) Competitve teams matched head to head. Money doesn't always triumph, but...

I mentioned St. John's several months ago. That team from last year had a $10 million dollar payroll according to Pitino. Now we enter revenue sharing.

The competitor for the St. John's revenue shares? They don't have a football program. Baseball you might think? No. It's the women's basketball team. (And hey, this isn't UCONN.)

To their credit, their women made it to the second round last year; of the WBIT.

20.5 million. Consider the percentage of that which will end up in the men's basketball program. Is it safe to say it would be proportional to what Alabama puts in football? So, more than 75 percent?

If my logic is sound and if my math is true it would mean the payroll for the men's program is now greater than what the NCAA allows a school to pay the entire athletic department in revenue 'shares.' A 10 million dollar payroll just received a 15 million dollar raise.




 
Back
Top Bottom