@planomateo setting that aside for a minute, a quick story.
I remember back in my early childhood being taught about the USSR. I'm guessing it was mid to late elementary, maybe as late as Jr. High, when they started getting into more details about how they restricted their citizens.
I remember seeing checkpoints on different war movies and TV shows. I remember hearing about how travel was restricted, people's ability to attend church interfered with, and other stories that built a "freedom" core in my life view, ya know? Stay out of my wallet, out of my house, and out of my life as much as possible.
Now...today, as I've thought for over a month now.
The purpose of a law/mandate to quarantine historically has been used to separate an individual or in some cases an entire group from the rest of the population. This. Where healthy people and businesses are being locked down?
Am I considering the phrase "martial law" to broadly? The governors are ordering, ordering a lot to shut down; businesses, church's during Easter, mandating what can and can not be purchased all the way down to food sources.
Is this a time where it was necessary? It appears to be working. But good lord there has to be some discussion here for the future. Just like this virus was an unknown, what they've done is unprecedented.
Two closing thoughts. The smallpox vaccine had the SCOTUS rule a mandate could be enforced for everyone to be vaccinated. There's argument there but does it warrant what we've seen.
A friend mentioned this to me a few days ago. SCOTUS also ruled in the '60's that even with the government has a legitimate purpose that can't pursue that goal if it results in liberties being taken away. I believe he quoted "stifle" when he was walking through this. He went on to say the ruling included phrasing like if there's a better route. Jobs, economy ... we've got a list here of millions that have been killed. My second thought is one versus the other ... tells me there was a smaller route. Rulings like this can't just say, "that industry is out." It's far too broad.