Who is "he" here? Jordan? I don't think you're trying to assign a gender on a computer model, are ya?I'm sorry but TeamRankings do not determine who gets in the dance. If he thinks we currently have a 81% chance to get in he is clueless.
...seeding. A run through the SECT would definitely be needed at a 16 win mark. That's only one game over .500.That would really help...
Who is "he" here? Jordan? I don't think you're trying to assign a gender on a computer model, are ya?
It looks to me you're jumping the gun a bit on what is being said here. I'm not sure.
Teamrankings.com's projections are based on 18 wins which would leave the Tide at 18-13: five games over .500. Three and four games over .500 have been the benchmark for the committee the last few years.
This morning:
NET - 40
RPI - 55
SOS - 17
I'm seeing quite a few clues that point to an NCAA invite.
I thought that might have been the case. Jordan has pointed to 19 as his number for a month or so now.That's not the way I read the tweet.
A win over two in their bubble watch means ... ?
I almost posted something similar in my last post but I was going to say "I think there are about a dozen teams fighting for four spots."There are about 15-20 teams in my opinion in the fight for 4 spots.
I almost posted something similar in my last post but I was going to say "I think there are about a dozen teams fighting for four spots."
Just glanced at a tweet from Lunardi...going back to two wins over two bubble teams (and he's got Bama in his bubble watch.) Would you agree a Bama win over MSU and UofSC knocks them out?
That would be sweet because you KNOW history shows that road will go through Kentucky.How about we just win the SEC Tournament and not have to worry about the selection committee?