Hey: It Takes Eleven: My bad , I was looking at the 05 season, Thanks.
bamarama007 said:Hey: It Takes Eleven: My bad , I was looking at the 05 season, Thanks.
bamarama007 said:Thanks again, I was looking at 04 stats......
bear facts said:Bamaman37 said:You're the only one here that keeps saying it over and over again. :roll:
:lol:
I'm beginning to think he has seceded and become part of "The Redundancy." :roll:
bamarama007 said:Nope, they did last year.
Vandy lost 5 games by a total scor of 15 points and beat Georgia at Georgia: 24/22
What you meant to say was they lost five by fifteen in 2004 and beat Georgia last year 24-22?
Or did you mean to say that last year they lost five by thirty and beat Georgia 24-22?
Keep on the sunny side of life.
porkchop said:What you meant to say was they lost five by fifteen in 2004 and beat Georgia last year 24-22?
Or did you mean to say that last year they lost five by thirty and beat Georgia 24-22?
Keep on the sunny side of life.
What 007 is trying to say is that, that one year a while back, Vandy (or one of them Tennessee teams? ) won some games against a team from Georgia who had that coach that time. And then they lost 15 more games by a combined 15 points that one year. Like in 2004 (or maybe it was 1983? ). And since Vandy returns 17 starters on offense the Tide, who has no talent comaparble to Vanderbilt, is in big trouble in Nashville because the rocking atmosphere of their 2,312-strong will rattle the Tide and then Shula...er...I mean, SABAN will be fired and Kevin Steele will take over.
What part of the converstion do you not understand? :evil:
bamarama007 said:AM I the only one here who thinks we will be lucky to get out of Nashville with a one point win?
Spikie said:Vandy looks tough this year with all the returners. The key there is that the returners are players, not benchwarmers.
Don't know about you, but they have hung awfully tough in recent years with all the better SEC teams and have beaten some of them. I'm a little worried...
Spikie said:Vandy looks tough this year with all the returners. The key there is that the returners are players, not benchwarmers.
Don't know about you, but they have hung awfully tough in recent years with all the better SEC teams and have beaten some of them. I'm a little worried...
porkchop said:What you meant to say was they lost five by fifteen in 2004 and beat Georgia last year 24-22?
Or did you mean to say that last year they lost five by thirty and beat Georgia 24-22?
Keep on the sunny side of life.
What 007 is trying to say is that, that one year a while back, Vandy (or one of them Tennessee teams? ) won some games against a team from Georgia who had that coach that time. And then they lost 15 more games by a combined 15 points that one year. Like in 2004 (or maybe it was 1983? ). And since Vandy returns 17 starters on offense the Tide, who has no talent comaparble to Vanderbilt, is in big trouble in Nashville because the rocking atmosphere of their 2,312-strong will rattle the Tide and then Shula...er...I mean, SABAN will be fired and Kevin Steele will take over.
What part of the converstion do you not understand? :evil:
porkchop said:What you meant to say was they lost five by fifteen in 2004 and beat Georgia last year 24-22?
Or did you mean to say that last year they lost five by thirty and beat Georgia 24-22?
Keep on the sunny side of life.
What 007 is trying to say is that, that one year a while back, Vandy (or one of them Tennessee teams? ) won some games against a team from Georgia who had that coach that time. And then they lost 15 more games by a combined 15 points that one year. Like in 2004 (or maybe it was 1983? ). And since Vandy returns 17 starters on offense the Tide, who has no talent comaparble to Vanderbilt, is in big trouble in Nashville because the rocking atmosphere of their 2,312-strong will rattle the Tide and then Shula...er...I mean, SABAN will be fired and Kevin Steele will take over.
What part of the converstion do you not understand? :evil: