@RollTideinGA , @It Takes Eleven , but I'm almost certain that while the ball (or in this case pylon) cannot cause a fumble, receivers MUST demonstrate ball security before the ground may dislodge it. In this case, we are not talking about a receiver but a ball carrier. And it seems obvious that he is losing his grip BEFORE he crosses the goal line. Thus, ball security isn't established to justify the TD. I mean, I've seen this many times, not on special teams plays, but on offense in goal line situations. How many times do we see a RB try to reach across the goal line and if he loses control of the ball, it's ruled a fumble???
He has to be judged to have possession when he breaks the plane. That's what I saw. I saw the contact with the pylon causing the fumble, so it was impossible to not have broken the plane before the fumble. He can fumble a moment after breaking the plane (which he did). Maintaining control to the ground comes into play on pass receptions while in the end zone.
It's old news, but something I pondered a lot in the few days after the game. I'm glad the officials and replay guys saw it the way I did.
RTR,
Tim

