| CURRENT EVENTS Trump vs the Democrats. I'm hearing the word "coup" a lot here lately describing the efforts made by the D's to win the election.
- Thread starter Max
- Start date
No. 1, it requires you to believe all of that... No. 2, it also requires for anyone to actually be arguing for open borders...
The claim was that it was government classified emails but the problem is that those claims came from thin air, and some of them even cited a "press release" from the NY AD that didn't exist making the claim.
FACT CHECK: Huma Abedin Cut FBI Deal, Kept Clinton E-Mails in 'Life Insurance' Folder?
Rumors claimed that Huma Abedin retained deleted e-mails belonging to Hillary Clinton in a folder called "life insurance" and cut a deal with the FBI.
www.snopes.com
footballer
Member
@BamaFan334, I certainly do not know many of the facts re AW laptop file marked Insurance policy. I don't think anyone in the public domain does. This file was found pre presidential election of Nov. 2016. That's when Comey reopened HRC email investigation just weeks prior to the election. Ultimately, Comey wrongfully cleared HRC of any crimes, although knowing there were classified emails contained on AW's laptop, as well as a lot of other damning evidence that remains concealed for the time being. It has been said by some, believed by some, that the Trump Patriots have the laptop in question, and all will be revealed at the appropriate time, as pedogate fully opens, and trials begin.
There are many videos re the Anthony Weiner laptop and the " Insurance Policy" on youtube. Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, had to sue in court to get some of the information through FOIA. I have picked a video at random that may shed a little light.
This is an older video,published in 12/17. There are now more recent videos which give many more facts and details.
There are many videos re the Anthony Weiner laptop and the " Insurance Policy" on youtube. Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, had to sue in court to get some of the information through FOIA. I have picked a video at random that may shed a little light.
This is an older video,published in 12/17. There are now more recent videos which give many more facts and details.
rocknthefreeworld
Member
On the Weiner note, since it has all blown over he has moved back in with Huma and their kid. She had filed for divorce when it all went down but withdrew it in January.
Yeah, at least one moderate publication thinks so... Are Democrats now the party of open borders?
More extensive positions from a publication to the right of above... https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...gration/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.97ab51f06a18
For anyone to believe that it means taking things anyone has actually SAID completely out of context or flat out lying.
rocknthefreeworld
Member
If you continually argue that people who entered the country illegally should be allowed to stay then you are basically for open borders. Not sure how anyone can see that any other way.
planomateo
Member
Neither party wants to fix it. It's a campaign/election platform that each party will run on and do nothing about it once they've been elected. Much like every other platform.
Sad as it is, it's the truth.
Sad as it is, it's the truth.
rocknthefreeworld
Member
Agreed. The two parties know that the best way to stay in power is to not really fix anything at all but make it out so that the other side will always make things worse.
For anyone to say the Democratic frontrunners want anything less than a decriminalization of illegal entry, with a no-deportation policy for those without felony convictions, is a flat-out liar. This is based on their ANSWERS to the Washington Post. Just acknowledge it without feverishly pressing the idiot button on your game system...
You know how I know you have no argument? You can't help but insult and call me a liar when you are doing nothing but misrepresenting facts. Why do all of those people that you are pointing to support the repeal on making illegal border crossing a criminal penalty? Because they want to make it a civil offense which will stop any separation of families. See, Eleven that is what we call context. It matters. That may be hard for you to understand, it seems. I also like how include a question on refugees as if somehow that has anything to do with ILLEGAL immigration. Every one of those candidates wants to overhaul immigration and make it easier to actually come here LEGALLY, but to the right that means "OPEN BORDERS! OMG! WE ARE ALL GETTING REPLACED BY MESSICANS!" Speaking of hitting the idiot button...
The hit dog yells the loudest. I simply took your words, from your post, alleging people are lying about these positions, and fed them back to you. It's clear, as depicted by the Washington Post, that the majority of the party candidates (including the frontrunners), want to decriminalize border crossings, and they do not want to include recent border crossers in their focus on deportations. You seized on the refugee/asylum issue, and ignored that democrats want to ignore any focus on deportation of recent crossers. You know, but won't admit, this will further open the floodgates of illegals. Whether you call it open borders or not, it's a proposed material relaxation of consequences for illegal entry, and a party position to promise residency (and government-funded health insurance, by the way) to those entering illegally. To not acknowledge that, on anyone's part, is patently dishonest and makes for a liar in my book.
Our politics can differ, but facts don't. A lazy position, followed by a frenzied wallowing that would make a bull walrus proud, is no way to debate.
Look at you continuing to ignore context because people like you dont need context, you just need something to back up the preconceived nonsense you spew. The priceless thing about this nonsense is that despite us having some of the most strict border policy in decades currently we also have the most illegal immigration in decades. Yes, just being more strict - not fixing the actual issues - is what fixes it.
I'm glad you gave the definition of a liar in your book. The definition of a liar in my book is taking something that others say and then completely twist it or remove very important context. Also, very interesting that we are talking about liars considering the current person sitting in the white house should be considered the liar-in-chief.
footballer
Member
For anyone who did not see this today, 7/24/19, Devin Nunes opening statement puts everything in a nutshell.
planomateo
Member
^^ They'll run his outta California thinking that way.
I hope you're not taking this anger home with you again. Trump is a liar, a cheat, amoral and is an overall sh!tty person. Put that straw man aside.
The democratic frontrunners have gone on record wanting to decriminalize illegal entrants, then de-emphasize deporting recent illegal entrants, and then offer them government-funded health care. If implemented, these policies will result in a significant expansion in illegal immigration. I'm not removing context. It's very clear. I have no preconceived notion to support.
footballer
Member
A rather long video from Prayingmedic that goes in depth of what has been going on in spygate. He explains pretty well many Q drops, in association with IG Horowitz first report last year. Published today, 7/27/19.
I heard he was with a militant faction of PETA and was killing as many dog-eating immigrants as possible.
Similar threads
