šŸŒŽ Israel vs. Iran, and where will the US fit in?

If a guy can be a Nobel Prize winner and "commit acts of war" 563 times ... ?

It would seem like a guy called Hitler for the last decade should get a couple of free passes, right? Logic tells me they'd at least want him to kill a few so they have something to point to in their rhetoric.
 
TerryP said:
It would seem like a guy called Hitler for the last decade
Click to expand...
Thatā€™s been nothing but domestic theater for Democratic and Republican partisans to squabble over. If you zoom out a bit and adjust your resolution, youā€™ll see heā€™s less Hitler and more Israeli ambassador to the United States.
 
Two random observations about "no one knew about this."

There's a Papa John's close to the Pentagon (as well as a bar/restaurant thing.) They noticed a big uptick in orders coming from the Pentagon before the strike. That's been indicative of that building when a big move is on the cusp.

I'm sure I'll run across the account eventually; it was on X. He was following info being released from one of the flight tracking sites and pointed out the movement. This was before I'd heard or read anything and with my disrupted sleep patterns the last week I've had no more than a couple of hours sleep at a time. In other words, looked at X and other sites more often than usual.

A thought that's not random in the least. Iran is posting on X no lives we lost. So, what's all the hub-bub about?
 
I can remember the American hostages being grabbed up in ā€˜79 by Iran. To me, last night was a long time coming. Previous presidents sat on their hands and appeased and appeased, bowing down to Iran, even giving pallets of money to the number supporter to terrorists. Iā€™m fine with this!
 
Krimson said:
Would've been a lot more effective if it was similar at all. That's just nonsense.
Click to expand...
The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) did a report last year I came across a few weeks ago. So, I may be a little off here; but it's not by much. Then it was estimated the country had less than 30 submarines. Japan had close to 200 when WW2 started. I think they had 13 fleet carriers: Iran?
 
The irony in that meme is if Iran did indeed have nuclear capability, it would carry some truth. So, based on that ... should have bombed Japan before Pearl Harbor?
 
TerryP said:
The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) did a report last year I came across a few weeks ago. So, I may be a little off here; but it's not by much. Then it was estimated the country had less than 30 submarines. Japan had close to 200 when WW2 started. I think they had 13 fleet
Click to expand...

The Iranian Navy has a fleet of 67 frontline commissioned vessels, excluding smaller patrol and auxiliary ships, according to World Directory of Modern Military Warships. This includes frigates, corvettes, fast attack craft, and patrol boats. The navy also operates a significant number of submarines and a variety of support ships.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

    • Frigates: 7
    • Corvettes: 5
    • Fast Attack Craft: 20
    • Patrol Boats: 6
    • Submarines: 19
    • Amphibious Ships: 31
    • Auxiliary Ships: 17
 
TerryP said:
The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) did a report last year I came across a few weeks ago. So, I may be a little off here; but it's not by much. Then it was estimated the country had less than 30 submarines. Japan had close to 200 when WW2 started. I think they had 13 fleet carriers: Iran?
Click to expand...
Iran was told what was going to happen if they didn't negotiate in good faith, given a timetable to comply, and a precision strike was carried out which should have resulted in no loss of life. Not comparable to Pearl Harbor

Iran's military is a joke, their big threat is closing the straits which they can do at least temporarily
 
I probably haven't followed this stuff as closely as some of you. but I'd guess Iran will (at some point soon) lob a few of their remaining missiles in the general direction of some US troops and/or US ships in the area. I doubt that they'd intend to directly hit either, but they'll make it seem as if they were just to save some face. And IMO, they certainly have a right to defend themselves and launch their own attack, against US and/or Israel. But at this point, they are the Black Knight with no arms and legs, despite their words. It would only get much worse for them from here...
 
Brandon Van de Graaff said:
I probably haven't followed this stuff as closely as some of you. but I'd guess Iran will (at some point soon) lob a few of their remaining missiles in the general direction of some US troops and/or US ships in the area. I doubt that they'd intend to directly hit either, but they'll make it seem as if they were just to save some face. And IMO, they certainly have a right to defend themselves and launch their own attack, against US and/or Israel. But at this point, they are the Black Knight with no arms and legs, despite their words. It would only get much worse for them from here...
Click to expand...
Pretty good observation
 
So we have Iran whose stated goal is to kill every Jew, destroy Israel. They are enriching Uranium in an underground bunker supplied by Hilliary Clinton using pallets of cash sent to them by the brown clown. The Liarcrats are upset because they are Jew haters, Holocaust deniers. What is the source for this pure hatred of the Jewish people and their support of Hamas/Hezbolla and other state sponsored terrorism? There have been numerous 2 State solutions proposed since 2000, none excepted. So what is the source of this intense hatred of the Jews?
 
Back
Top Bottom