Some years ago I gave expression to my own feelingāanti-patriotic feeling, it will doubtless be calledāin a somewhat startling way. It was at the time of the second Afghan war, when, in pursuance of what were thought to be āour interestsā, we were invading Afghanistan. News had come that some of our troops were in danger. At the Athenaeum Club a well-known military manāthen a captain but now a generalādrew my attention to a telegram containing this news, and read it to me in a manner implying the belief that I should share his anxiety. I astounded him by replying: āWhen men hire themselves out to shoot other men to order, asking nothing about the justice of their cause, I donāt care if they are shot themselves.ā
I foresee the exclamation which will be called forth. Such a principle, it will be said, if accepted, would make an army impossible and a government powerless. It would never do to have each soldier use his judgment about the purpose for which a battle is waged. Military organization would be paralysed and our country would be a prey to the first invader.
Not so fast, is the reply. For one war an army would remain just as available as nowāa war of national defence. In such a war every soldier would be conscious of the justice of his cause. He would not be engaged in dealing death among men about whose doings, good or ill, he knew nothing, but among men who were manifest transgressors against himself and his compatriots. Only aggressive war would be negatived, not defensive war.