Nice try, Cathy Newman.
My version is irrelevant. What’s relevant to this discussion is whether or not the Gospel and NT support political Zionism and Israel’s aggression and expansion. My point is that the text of the NT, and the whole concept of a
new covenant, repudiates (1) the racist and tribal favoritism of the OT, and (2) the notion that divine favor can be summoned by birthright or by pious adherence to Torah or any other legalistic ideology. Instead, the scope of the Gospel is universal, international, and cosmopolitan. One’s race, sex, class, home country, etc., are neither advantages nor disadvantages to spiritual salvation. “For God so loved the
Jews world…”
To
@Krimson ’s point, yes, you can certainly find excerpts here and there of a delicate handling of Jewish affairs, Romans 11 being such an example. I had to reread it again before replying, and I was reminded how convoluted it is. I mean seriously, it’s difficult to take away anything concrete because Paul back pedals as much as he asserts. To me it reads like Paul is trying to assuage Jewish members at a time when keeping all young churches intact and unified is critical. We know the necessity of Torah observance was a point of contention. Jewish followers of Jesus probably resented or felt marginalized by the influx of Gentile membership and Greco-Roman (ie pagan) influence over the new religion.
You assume wrong.
Because I’m an atheist, I don’t hate god or Jesus.