🏈 Did he catch the ball?

[passiesforauburn.com]

All I need to know is, did our receiver catch the ball or not? Who is the guy reviewing the tapes in the booth? Do you know his name?

www.passiesforauburn.com

 

[Argo]

This is the worst attempt at spam that I have ever seen.

 

[passiesforauburn.com]

I need HELP!

I would like to do some research on the guy reviewing the plays in the booth. Can anyone give me his name?

 

[passiesforauburn.com]

No spam

I could go other places to spam. I'm try'n to find out this guys name.

 

[imported_porkchop]

I don't think anyoneone here knows the name is why you are not getting a response.

BTW, I sent you a private message just a minute ago that you might want to take a look at regarding the rules and regs here.

 

[passiesforauburn.com]

Refs under review

My neighbor told me he read on yahoo sports that the SEC would like to meet with the refs to review calls. Has anyone else read this?

 

[Nate]

I just wanna see the video of the catch

 

[Guest]

I fail to see how it was ruled incomplete? The guy was layed out with both hands on the ball. How much more control can you have when you hit the ground? It's IMO a B.S. call!

 

[Rolling Tide]

I fail to see how it was ruled incomplete? The guy was layed out with both hands on the ball. How much more control can you have when you hit the ground? It's IMO a B.S. call!

I am with you. I dont see how they can call it incomplete either. I will give that one a big "BS" call.

 

[Roll Tide Rev]

Yes this was the worst reversal I have ever seen. I am not blaming the loss on this lone call, but it made me angry to say the least.

 

[rammajamma]

So won't the SEC look at this? Kind of like they did with the Ole Piss call?

 

[jjtLSU]

I agree with you guys that was a bad call

 

[BAMAFSTBACK]

definately a catch and most definately a game changer. We still got three games left and a shot at the cotton bowl and 10 wins! It's been 24 hours and I'm ready for Croom!

 

[rammajamma]

Here is the head of the SEC replay officials.

 

[TerryP]

I don't know what purpose you would serve by doing "research" on the ref. It was a questionable call, sure. But, those things happen.

FWIW, his name is James Allison if I recall correctly.

 

[Argo]

Nose of the ball is on the ground WITHOUT his hands under it.

Watching it live and during the review I thought it was a catch. Now that I see this picture I think it was the right call.

 

[BAMAFSTBACK]

That picture is damning. However, he had already pulled the other end of the ball to his chest. Definately a call that should have gone the receivers way. "Tie goes to the runner" sort of thing.

 

[imported_Porter]

Nose of the ball is on the ground WITHOUT his hands under it.

Watching it live and during the review I thought it was a catch. Now that I see this picture I think it was the right call.

I would agree with that. With the video angles, it certainly appeared to be a catch, but I guess they got it right after-all.

 

[BigAl]

Nose of the ball is on the ground WITHOUT his hands under it.

Watching it live and during the review I thought it was a catch. Now that I see this picture I think it was the right call.

I would agree with that. With the video angles, it certainly appeared to be a catch, but I guess they got it right after-all.

Dang sure looks that way dont it.

 

[Swamptick]

It really does not matter though right? I mean we scored later on that drive.