In the first few days of this thread I mentioned my being reticent to make judgements on how this has all been handled because of that very issue; the information we were dealing with. Some of the things I've seen suggested baffle me because seldom do they take into account the unintended consequences.
(As example, "Trump should have done something sooner." IF we go with that for a minute, and ignore what the WHO was saying at the time, let's say he did shut down travel. Let's say he did start the stay at home sooner. When was that supposed to happen? Let's say it starts at the beginning of March...
How many would be yelling about Trump trying to subvert the democratic election process by shutting things down in the middle of the Super Tuesday campaign runs? But I digress ... )
Back to the subject at hand ... I think it was
@#80 who cited numbers in NY the last couple of days. NY numbers = bad information.
Then again, this is from the New York Times...such a bastion of integrity.
The city has added more than 3,700 additional people who were presumed to have died of the coronavirus but had never tested positive.
www.nytimes.com