Squirrely things are already happening in some of the computer ranking systems used as a part of the BCS formula. In Massey Ratings, for example, we've been ranked #1 since the start of the season, until today. We just put a major whipping on Kentucky, yet Massey now has us #2 with Oregon as #1 and FSU #3. Colley Matrix, another one of the six BCS computer rating systems, actually has us at #4 while FSU is #1. Sagarin has us #2 and Oregon #1. I understand that the computers make up only 1/3 of the formula, but I'm concerned that, if the regular season ends with more than two undefeated, AP top-5 teams, margin of victory and the perceived strength of the SEC champion could become critical factors for Alabama (not just winning).
I've not seen the projected week seven BCS standings yet (usually updated at some point on Monday) so if we use week six as an example we'd have the Tide ranked as follows:
[TABLE="width: 795"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="width: 38, align: center"]Rank[/TD]
[TD="width: 38, align: center"] Pvs[/TD]
[TD="width: 108, align: center"] Team[/TD]
[TD="width: 24, align: center"] Rk[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] Coach[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] %[/TD]
[TD="width: 24, align: center"] Rk[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] AP[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] %[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] AH[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] CM[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] JS[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] KM[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] Md*[/TD]
[TD="width: 30, align: center"] RB[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] Cp Avg[/TD]
[TD="width: 56, align: center"] BCS[/TD]
[TD="width: 47, align: center"] Conf[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"] 1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"] 1[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] Alabama[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 1[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 1544[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 0.9961[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 1[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 1495[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 0.9967[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 1[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 4[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 2[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 3[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 2[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 2[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 0.950[/TD]
[TD="align: general"] 0.9809[/TD]
[TD="align: center"] SEC[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
We'd have one computer ranking dropped giving us #1, 2, 3, 2, and 2.
Looking at Oregon, just as one example, if we dropped their lowest ranking with AH-#10, they'd still have CM-#10 along with KM and RB ranking them 7th.
If we chose to rank teams based on the computers alone Clemson and Stanford would be ranked higher than Oregon after week six.
Looking at rankings as a whole, Oregon is trailing Clemson in the BCS standings as of week six with a larger margin separating those two teams than Clemson and Bama.
I've not made a comparison in the last 12 hours or so but one key to look at is where the votes Stanford was receiving ended up landing after their lossāOregon, Clemson, or Ohio State.