No, I think you are an 18 year old kid because you say you have never met a person who doesn't like RJ. I could say that I am a 10' tall alien from mars and it is just as valid. The logical fallacy of straw man got tossed out earlier. What you have done by saying you have never met... is make an assertion by appeal to popularity. From an argument position it is the same as saying "Because I said so," and "it is right because lots of people say it is." You are using your lack of personal experience in not having met people to add merit to your point. That is worse than straw man in logic.
Going back to my original point with the football players walking off the field...
I see them with respect. They are fallen warriors. I respond with appreciation for the game I just had the opportunity to witness because they represented their institution.
You respond by taunting them for losing.
I take issue with that.
My argument has nothing to do with whether or not someone is a sidewalk alumnus or not. I didn't go to Alabama. I can't post on the JSU message boards even though I played for Burgess because I am a Bama fan and the JSU message boards are nasty to people who cheer for anyone other than JSU.
I feel that it is morally wrong to taunt. At best RJ is prideful.
I can't disagree with your point at all, the only problem I ever had is the way you argued it. Calling people children and implying that they are trailer trash just doesn't seem like a very logical way to go about an argument in which you're point is that what they're doing isn't classy.
You may need to check your login, Big Fan. Someone stole your password the other day to go into great detail of how much they thought Troy sucked. Everything about it, and then gleefully noted the taunting insult contained in an often used song played by the band. Do you think that song should be banned as well?
No, I think you are an 18 year old kid because you say you have never met a person who doesn't like RJ. I could say that I am a 10' tall alien from mars and it is just as valid. The logical fallacy of straw man got tossed out earlier. What you have done by saying you have never met... is make an assertion by appeal to popularity. From an argument position it is the same as saying "Because I said so," and "it is right because lots of people say it is." You are using your lack of personal experience in not having met people to add merit to your point. That is worse than straw man in logic.
Going back to my original point with the football players walking off the field...
I see them with respect. They are fallen warriors. I respond with appreciation for the game I just had the opportunity to witness because they represented their institution.
You respond by taunting them for losing.
I take issue with that.
My argument has nothing to do with whether or not someone is a sidewalk alumnus or not. I didn't go to Alabama. I can't post on the JSU message boards even though I played for Burgess because I am a Bama fan and the JSU message boards are nasty to people who cheer for anyone other than JSU.
I feel that it is morally wrong to taunt. At best RJ is prideful.
Where does it say "we just beat the hell out of you?"
Entirely different issue. Post Hoc poisoning of the well. Troy can suck and JSU can play a song and shout that Troy sucks. It has no bearing, relevance, or similarity to taunting a football team that just lost. Also...nothing taunting about stating "Troy Sucks." It is a simple statement only relevant within the context of the rivalry. Shouting we just beat the hell out of you at San Jose after a humiliating defeat is morally objectionable.
I still miss "The Man Show".
Cool find. I am hoping to have the opportunity to teach logic at Western KY next year, though I think I will spend more time on statement logic and truth tables than anything else.
Thats about as stupid an argument as the people that don't think non alumni should cheer for Alabama.
So what if you spent hundreds of hours conditioning and blah blah blah. You go into the game knowing one team is going to lose.
Should Bama refuse to play teams we are favored over because it might hurt their poor little feelings when we beat them as expected? Should our team not hit other players as hard as they can because our players are more talented? I mean seriously.
It gets on my nerves so bad when people can't respect the fact that other people are allowed to make their own decisions about something. Instead of respecting others rights they try and ban everything they don't like or agree with.
If you don't like it, either don't participate, leave early, put in some ear plugs, or even pass out ear plugs to opposing teams so they don't have to hear it if they don't want to.
Let me get this right. A rehearsed slight toward another group is not taunting? Is it prideful? Is it okay to taunt a rival in defeats that are other than humiliating? Is a victory that is less than close but falls short of humiliating in that RJYH sweet spot?
I can't help it if you don't see the difference in a the trumpet line shouting "Troy Sucks" in the middle of dixie, and 100,000 people screaming we just beat the hell out of you. Troy Sucks in dixie is not university sanctioned, it is a band thing.
\So it's a closely guarded secret between the band and you? No one else knows about it or joins in? I can't help it if you can't see the inconsistency of your actions. Whether it's sanctioned or "impromptu", joined in by few or all, pride is pride, insults are insults, and taunts are taunts.
\
Yep pride is pride, etc.
which is why I differentiate between yelling "Troy Sucks" in the middle of Dixie when JSU is playing Ole Miss, and 100,000 Alabama fans shouting we just beat the hell out of you at a team that just lost to Alabama. One is arrogant, boasting, prideful, and the other isn't.
So if it's not an arrogant, boastful or prideful insult, what type of insult is it?
I want to clarify a thing or two.
(1) I was calm and had simply state my opinion until nate comes along and wrote this post insulting my position. Nate, you can claim you did or didn't do whatever, but this post you use snide language "blah blah blah," and call my rather eloquent argument "about as stupid an argument as the people...."
That was insulting.
You can say you didn't attack me, but that was an insult.
(2) If someone with access to the writer site will look, I posted the Trickle down at 2:30 this morning. It took 6 hours to write and several hours after posting it to edit. To make a long story short, I have not slept since night before last because I was up all night doing that piece. I am probably over reacting right now, but that insult is what set me off. I just wont post anymore on the subject.
Nate said:Thats about as stupid an argument as the people that don't think non alumni should cheer for Alabama.:bird:
![]()
)
So what if you spent hundreds of hours conditioning and blah blah blah:blah-blah:.(too lazy to type the rest of the stuff you said :bolt
You go into the game knowing one team is going to lose.
Should Bama refuse to play teams we are favored over because it might hurt their poor little feelings when we beat them as expected? :bsflag::flash::nutkick: Should our team not hit other players as hard as they can because our players are more talented?:bolt:I mean seriously.
anic:
It gets on my nerves so bad when people can't respect the fact that other people are allowed to make their own decisions about something. :halo: Instead of respecting others rights they try and ban everything they don't like or agree with. :nopity: :headscratch:
If you don't like it, either don't participate, leave early, put in some ear plugs, or even pass out ear plugs to opposing teams so they don't have to hear it if they don't want to. :hyper: :stick: :grimace:
:cheers: getting :flash: and :bootyshake: since 1893Emoticons. Ending differences since 1996.