Y'all heard what kiffin said?
In the USF game we did put pressure on the QB. We let him escape the pocket and run for over 100 yards as a result. That is an issue but in game 1 and 3 we put pressure on the QB. Against Tx we did not.The OL just can't pass block. USF was undersized and beat the line often.
How are we not putting more heat on opposing QBs? Our QBs are feeling heat often. Simpson needs to get that internalclock tuned up a bit. Our LT is too slow. Ty is gonna get hurt if someone doesn't learn to protect the blind side. Many questions, but I still think coach may get turned around, but we / I need to be realistic with my expectations. If anyone can get it straight, coach Saban can do it.
Roll Tide everyone.
Y'all heard what kiffin said?
I don't think so..... I think there's some truth to it.Just Kiffin stirring up stuff... Trying to find a way to get an advantage.
I would not be surprised too. Didn't Golding have to call plays when it became apparent that Tosh.O wasn't getting the job done?I don't think so..... I think there's some truth to it.
Yup. I'm gonna let @TerryP or @Brandon Van de Graaff confirm the rumor...I would not be surprised too. Didn't Golding have to call plays when it became apparent that Tosh.O wasn't getting the job done?
I would.Taking Ole Miss plus the points sounds awfully tempting
I am gonna.I would.
Do two bets.. on for each optionI am gonna.
And hope i lose bad
Me. This isn't about Golding. This is about the Bama O that we have seen last 2 weeksA good number of people who are saying "take Ole Miss and the points" were the same one's talking about how badly Bama played on defense under Golding.
17 points against USF sounds like something Golding can work with. Besides, if it comes down to a shootout, I'll take Kiffin over Rees every time.A good number of people who are saying "take Ole Miss and the points" were the same one's talking about how badly Bama played on defense under Golding.
Or any DC17 points against USF sounds like something Golding can work with.
A good number of people who are saying "take Ole Miss and the points" were the same one's talking about how badly Bama played on defense under Golding.
This makes a hell of a lot of sense: as in none.Although I can't wait to see if our offense sputters yet again if you keep saying "it wasn't Golding".
This makes a hell of a lot of sense: as in none.
I just can’t, ever, bet against Bama. Even with play money!A good number of people who are saying "take Ole Miss and the points" were the same one's talking about how badly Bama played on defense under Golding.
Just seems like I’m being unfaithful if I did that!I just can’t, ever, bet against Bama. Even with play money!
I've said for years now that the issue on defense isn't on the DC but the scheme. It's outdated and easily beaten. Hell, last year's defense gave up fewer points than any Bama defense has in the last five years but the angsts voiced certainly didn't match that fact.It makes a lot of sense when you act like the issues last year were not even a little of Golding's fault, yet making jokes that the ones taking Ole Miss and the points are the same ones that wanted Golding gone. Yet you aren't mentioning that he's facing a limp dick offense instead of the last ten we've had that averaged 40 a game. Make better sense to you?