Unless Houston gets gobbled up into a Power 5 Conference in the next 2 or 3 years... wouldn't be surprised to see it happen.If all this, on the job training, has paid off for Kiffin I would agree. The letters AAC pretty much guarantees this job to be a stepping stone gig and there isn't a big enough buyout clause that can alter that reality.
This site and possibly TD (I don't frequent that one) are a hard on for Boz but he gets quite a bit right too... Off the top of my head this season he was accurate on Hurts, Blake Barnett transfer, Shank Taylor injury, Blake S running scout QB, all before I heard it anywhere else... And I'm sure some other stuff too.
I bust his balls quite a bit but a lot of people never say **** when he's right.
Unless Houston gets gobbled up into a Power 5 Conference in the next 2 or 3 years... wouldn't be surprised to see it happen.
Now that Texas has got their coach maybe they will be the benevolent Bevo and let them in.
I don't think those ass-hats will ever learn. UT and OU ran rough-shod over the entire Big XII for years and ran off aTm and Nebraska. They have all but ruined the conference and have no one left to pick up to try and make the conference reputable again. UT deserves to suck from now till forever.
I don't think those ass-hats will ever learn. UT and OU ran rough-shod over the entire Big XII for years and ran off aTm and Nebraska. They have all but ruined the conference and have no one left to pick up to try and make the conference reputable again. UT deserves to suck from now till forever.
I can't speak for the members here, but I can speak for this site.his site and possibly TD (I don't frequent that one) are a hard on for Boz but he gets quite a bit right too..
I can't speak for the members here, but I can speak for this site.
I've said, for years and years, it's not what you say but how you say it. As exampled in the thread that grad linked, there's an issue there. The story is simply this; he rubbed a good many people the wrong way and a few took those feelings to the extreme.
It is what it is.
Now, as to my thoughts?
It doesn't matter whether or not this is true. What matters is these are the kind of things that aren't anyone's business. It's also an another example of very poor judgement to be posting these things on public forums.
View attachment 6350
I won't even begin to try to understand the motivation of a person who puts these kind of things out there.
I know, for a fact, he's posted some things that came straight from the locker room. The thing is, I also know who sent those original text messages out as well. Those were not meant to be shared on public forums.
I don't know the guy. I do know what kind of reputation he's created.
All that being said, a few days ago I mentioned it wasn't a good idea to assume Sark is going to just slide into the position. The message is the same as what @CrimsonBoz posted ... it's how you say it, right? (And I'm the smallest of the small when it comes to living in a PC world.)
I can't speak for the members here, but I can speak for this site.
I've said, for years and years, it's not what you say but how you say it. As exampled in the thread that grad linked, there's an issue there. The story is simply this; he rubbed a good many people the wrong way and a few took those feelings to the extreme.
It is what it is.
Now, as to my thoughts?
It doesn't matter whether or not this is true. What matters is these are the kind of things that aren't anyone's business. It's also an another example of very poor judgement to be posting these things on public forums.
View attachment 6350
I won't even begin to try to understand the motivation of a person who puts these kind of things out there.
I know, for a fact, he's posted some things that came straight from the locker room. The thing is, I also know who sent those original text messages out as well. Those were not meant to be shared on public forums.
I don't know the guy. I do know what kind of reputation he's created.
All that being said, a few days ago I mentioned it wasn't a good idea to assume Sark is going to just slide into the position. The message is the same as what @CrimsonBoz posted ... it's how you say it, right? (And I'm the smallest of the small when it comes to living in a PC world.)
Hey man, I guess it's technically your job to police the internet... Not mine. I'm just saying over the past 2-3 years I've been pleasently surprised with the amount of accurate info I've read. He's got some stuff wrong also, as I'm sure you have (the nature of college football info), but doesn't mean it doesn't entertain the hell out of me.
I use Alabama football sites for 2 things: 1. Information 2. Entertainment. Not moral clarity.
I happen to think he's a pretty decent dude... If Sark gets drunk and pukes on himself (joking), that's on Sark, not Boz. Truth is bound to come out either way.
Roll Tide, Terry.
And if someone gives him inside information with the understanding that he's not gonna run his mouth all over the internet THAT is on him... I've always had an issue with Boz mainly because I don't think he's ever witnessed a single practice or scrimmage like he claims he has. I do believe he knows someone (whether it be a booster or whatever) that sends him updates and "insider info" and 90% of the time Boz takes that guys opinion as fact and starts spreading the **** everywhere. Like when he claimed Bateman was the "for sure starter" last year or that Hurts would start from day one. Claiming that guys tore their ACL's last year when there was nothing even close to it. That's the stuff that gets on my nerves. I know everybody wants insider info and fiend for this kind of stuff but it results in a lot of BS or opinions being spun as facts and "insider knowledge."
