POV: The system, is telling you that you can't question the system. We can turn this into a constitutional discussion if you like: starting with the very first part.
I would suggest the they you speak of is nut jobs from both sidesThey want a civil war so bad… it’s only getting worse… I wonder what major false flag we are going to see next… maybe a briefcase bomb..who knows…
No its the government…They need more and more distractions for the mess that they’ve made and the debt that they’ve caused us to endure.. so they feed the beast.. and it will eventually erupt… I suggest you prepare just in case… if you choose too..I would suggest the they you speak of is nut jobs from both sides
What those people don’t realize is..when they finally get that government that they want so bad… they will be the first to be lined up and shot… history will always repeat itself as far as Marxism and communism go..I would equate it to a gay version of the USSR, but instead of parading soldiers and ICBMs down red square, we parade the Dildo Brigade sponsored by Disney, Pfizer, and Lockheed Martin.
One. How do you not understand, it wasn't a felony.He did get a fair shot. Had it not been a jury trial then I’d agree with you. A jury convicted him, he wasn’t screwed, it wasn’t rigged, the pos falsified his records and now is a felon
According to Maxine Waters, they are all in the hills. With so many not knowing what the word "computer" means...how would you suggest these people be spoken to?I would suggest the they you speak of is nut jobs from both sides
You’re right it wasn’t a felony it was 34 felonies. Well then if what he did isn’t illegal then the NY appeals court will overturn, if they don’t I won’t be surprised by how y’all on here react or what y’all have to say.One. How do you not understand, it wasn't a felony.
Two. How do you not understand what he did wasn't against the law?
Three. It's NY.
Four. A guy quits his job at the DOJ to take a lowly position with the DA's office in NY: for this trial. Rigged, election interference.
There is no law, nothing, that says writing "legal expenses" to a lawyer who is handling your legal expenses is falsifying records. No one picked up this case outside of the guy how campaigned on this trial.
It's bullshit. For this country...and that's where your lack of insight shocks me.
Huh? What are you talking about?According to Maxine Waters, they are all in the hills. With so many not knowing what the word "computer" means...how would you suggest these people be spoken to?
IF a defendent is not allowed to call and question his own witnesses how do that fit with a fair trial? IE: FCC guy that the judge wouldn't allow.The jury still has to find him guilty, it’s astounding how you on the right or right of center (you know because you’re not a righty and all) can’t grasp this. Doesn’t matter who picked up the case, who quit what to go where, the bottom line a JURY found him guilty unanimously!
Look up the clip with Waters talking about all the protesters hiding in the hills ready to create violence after the election. The lady is bat shit crazy. It's hilarious.Huh? What are you talking about?
Homeboy said “they want a civil war” and I said the they he speaks of is nut jobs from both sides.
You’re meaning everybody in government right?
Next you’ll tell me the judge didn’t allow Trump to testify.IF a defendent is not allowed to call and question his own witnesses how do that fit with a fair trial? IE: FCC guy that the judge wouldn't allow.
It's not about right, left, right of center, whatever. It's about the absolute abuse of the law.
Again. It's a NY law that a judge can't contribute to a campaign. He broke the law, while ruling over the opponent he supports. If you need, read that again.
She is bat shit crazy. I’m not a Waters person.Look up the clip with Waters talking about all the protesters hiding in the hills ready to create violence after the election. The lady is bat shit crazy. It's hilarious.
Oh and one other thing I’ll add straight from Trump’s lawyer’s mouth on CNN when asked why the defense didn’t call any witnesses he answered “because we happen to live in America where the burden of proof doesn’t lie with he defense, it’s not a defense attorney’s job to help make it easier for the prosecution”, so while you’re saying with your whole throat that the judge didn’t allow witnesses Trump’s own lawyer said it was the defense’s choice not to, so was Trump’s lawyer and the judge working together?IF a defendent is not allowed to call and question his own witnesses how do that fit with a fair trial? IE: FCC guy that the judge wouldn't allow.
It's not about right, left, right of center, whatever. It's about the absolute abuse of the law.
Again. It's a NY law that a judge can't contribute to a campaign. He broke the law, while ruling over the opponent he supports. If you need, read that again.
I'll get back to this post when I get back from fishing.It would be funny if it wasn’t so ignorant, this NY judge is corrupt and blah blah, but a SCOTUS justice getting hooked up with trips and a lot of other shit is fine (Thomas) or a SCOTUS judge getting the royal treatment by Christian groups and pro-life groups (Barrett) is fine, or a justice flying right wing, pro Jan 6 flags is fine while ruling on said subjects isn’t corrupt or anything? Spare me dude
I remember when slick Willie got elected…within one year Norfolk looked like it was hit by a bomb.. squadrons, ships, jets and units were getting Decommed and stripped.. Buildings mothballed and broken out (all useful materials removed from the structures).. sailors were given early outs on demand.. forced retirements.. electricity was being rationed.. Within one year, Oceana , Dam Neck and Little Creek (bases) were like ghost towns.. even the gyms and morale centers were closed..even on base private businesses went out of business…Didn't Bill Clinton pay money to Paula Jones hush money while President? And it was from his time as the Arky gov.
Another thing that chaps my ass. They call it a threat to our democracy. We are not a democratic society. We are a Constitutional Federalist Republic. Yet media (dumb asses) and people alike continue to refer to it at that.
Something I find interesting. All democrats look at Clinton as an amazing president for his time and tenure. If you look at Trump's presidency and the things he focused on it is eerily similar, hell even speeches on border control/protection sound identical, yet Clinton was lauded for his stance while Trump is vilified.
No wars during either of their presidency, and they both focused on the economy and did a good job at it.
Clinton brought about don't ask don't tell to the military. While Trump did nothing drastic in regard to the LGBTQ community, he did nothing disparaging or anything negative towards their individual rights. Yet is harped on to be racist and or homophobic. His history of philanthropy towards those "minorities" would suggest otherwise.
They closed the Charleston Navy base officially in 1996. On April 1st. To this day I wonder...why that day.I remember when slick Willie got elected…within one year Norfolk looked like it was hit by a bomb.. squadrons, ships, jets and units were getting Decommed and stripped.. Buildings mothballed and broken out (all useful materials removed from the structures).. sailors were given early outs on demand.. forced retirements.. electricity was being rationed.. Within one year, Oceana , Dam Neck and Little Creek (bases) were like ghost towns.. even the gyms and morale centers were closed..even on base private businesses went out of business…
Well one big different is Clinton didn’t try to hide it. Trump didn’t get charged for paying hush money to a hooker, he got charged for trying to hide it.Didn't Bill Clinton pay money to Paula Jones hush money while President? And it was from his time as the Arky gov.
Another thing that chaps my ass. They call it a threat to our democracy. We are not a democratic society. We are a Constitutional Federalist Republic. Yet media (dumb asses) and people alike continue to refer to it at that.
Something I find interesting. All democrats look at Clinton as an amazing president for his time and tenure. If you look at Trump's presidency and the things he focused on it is eerily similar, hell even speeches on border control/protection sound identical, yet Clinton was lauded for his stance while Trump is vilified.
No wars during either of their presidency, and they both focused on the economy and did a good job at it.
Clinton brought about don't ask don't tell to the military. While Trump did nothing drastic in regard to the LGBTQ community, he did nothing disparaging or anything negative towards their individual rights. Yet is harped on to be racist and or homophobic. His history of philanthropy towards those "minorities" would suggest otherwise.
I’ve got no anger, so I’d think about that again.I'll get back to this post when I get back from fishing.
There's the anger I've tried to point you to on a few occasions.
Is hate a better word? Despise?I’ve got no anger, so I’d think about that again.