🌎 The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials.

[Rsedge72]

No evidence, daughter of judge making millions, a woman that had to be coached on what to say and where she was violated. Even though her 1st claim said that it wasn’t physical rape, then when it didn’t get the blood boiling enough, it was physical. It’s all silly…
Once again “TDS”!

 

[Rsedge72]

Read the transcripts. Even ABC has backed off the claims of the 34 felonies.

 

[ElephantStomp]

No evidence, daughter of judge making millions, a woman that had to be coached on what to say and where she was violated. Even though her 1st claim said that it wasn’t physical rape, then when it didn’t get the blood boiling enough, it was physical. It’s all silly…
Once again “TDS”!

He was found guilty in civil court of sexual assault and has to pay $5 million to a lady.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Read the transcripts. Even ABC has backed off the claims of the 34 felonies.

I hate to break it to you buddy, but he was found guilty of 34 felonies whether you like it or not or whether you believe it or not. In a criminal court he was found guilty by a jury of his peers of 34 felonies of falsifying business records.

 

[Rsedge72]

TDS!!!

 

[Rsedge72]

I hate to break it to you buddy, but he was found guilty of 34 felonies whether you like it or not or whether you believe it or not. In a criminal court he was found guilty by a jury of his peers of 34 felonies of falsifying business records.

Falsifying business records, but they couldn’t come up with a legal precedent for that accusation. You’ve obviously not followed the case nor read the transcripts. They’ve spewed their rhetoric until the less critical thinkers are fooled.
I was no fan of trumps believe me, but his policies align with mine and most people. He just doesn’t have that D next to his name anymore. The NGo’s making them rich is going away. That’s the real problem. Just call it what it is, the money train is coming to an end, so you fall in line with your masters.

 

[Rsedge72]

He was found guilty in civil court of sexual assault and has to pay $5 million to a lady.

He doesn’t have to pay that, follow the case and read the transcripts. Even though the MSM won’t tell you that.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Falsifying business records, but they couldn’t come up with a legal precedent for that accusation. You’ve obviously not followed the case nor read the transcripts. They’ve spewed their rhetoric until the less critical thinkers are fooled.
I was no fan of trumps believe me, but his policies align with mine and most people. He just doesn’t have that D next to his name anymore. The NGo’s making them rich is going away. That’s the real problem. Just call it what it is, the money train is coming to an end, so you fall in line with your masters.

Well he was found guilty. I followed it enough to hear the jury say “Guilty” 34 times. Evidence proved his guilt and a jury found him guilty. It’s funny to me that if Biden was found guilty of 34 felonies y’all on the right would be tickled pink and screaming about it, but because it’s your leader y’all think its bs, it’s comical.

His policies align with most people huh? Weird because only 49% of voters for him, so what you mean is half of all voters not most people. 152,322,798 people voted in the last election, not even half the country voted, so most isn’t correct.

 

[ElephantStomp]

He doesn’t have to pay that, follow the case and read the transcripts. Even though the MSM won’t tell you that.

You’re right, he doesn’t have to pay that, he has to pay her $83.3 million and the $5 million. I mean his DOJ is trying real hard to help him out and he lost his original appeal. I will say it says something that Trump using the DOJ (funded by taxpayers) to fight a civil case

 

[Rsedge72]

Your silly…

 

[TerryP]

I hate to break it to you buddy, but he was found guilty of 34 felonies whether you like it or not or whether you believe it or not. In a criminal court he was found guilty by a jury of his peers of 34 felonies of falsifying business records.

And THAT was the biggest load of shit I've seen. And I am one of those that hope it comes back to bite that prosecution team in the ass.

And, for what it's worth...there was no jury of his peers.

 

[TerryP]

You can say whatever you want, but the only people wanting him prosecuted are the same that believe the 34 time convicted felonies were a witch hunt. Also, the same ones that agree that judges should have less power over what this administration is doing

A district judge passing an order that effects national policy. Yeah, I got a problem with that. You would to is the district I live in had a judge pass a ruling that affects you. You know damn well you'd be "up in arms" if it were a different subject.

To me, it's quite funny. I see no mention of Michael Cohen's and littered throughout those charges. It's akin to calling Diddy for the prosecution in a "Me Too" case.

 

[TerryP]

You can say whatever you want, but the only people wanting him prosecuted are the same that believe the 34 time convicted felonies were a witch hunt. Also, the same ones that agree that judges should have less power over what this administration is doing

First of all, I don't believe this to be true. I believe there are people who look at the felonies and accept them and they also want Fauci prosecuted.

Personally, I find that case to be somewhat of a joke. People pay "hush money" all the time. It's nothing new. But here things changed. I believe it boils down to whom.

The "real estate" crimes? A witch hunt in a Kangaroo court.

(Was it the Carroll case where the judge didn't allow exculpatory evidence to be submitted?)

Back to Fauci for a minute. Do you think he could sit down for a second and explain what he's been pardoned for?

 

[ElephantStomp]

And THAT was the biggest load of shit I've seen. And I am one of those that hope it comes back to bite that prosecution team in the ass.

And, for what it's worth...there was no jury of his peers.

There was a jury of his peers, I mean not bankrupt, shitty business people, but NYC peers.

 

[ElephantStomp]

A district judge passing an order that effects national policy. Yeah, I got a problem with that. You would to is the district I live in had a judge pass a ruling that affects you. You know damn well you'd be "up in arms" if it were a different subject.

To me, it's quite funny. I see no mention of Michael Cohen's and littered throughout those charges. It's akin to calling Diddy for the prosecution in a "Me Too" case.

District judges don’t affect national policy, I mean come on man, it’ll go to court of appeals, then SCOTUS if they choose to hear arguments. Do you disagree with SCOTUS putting checks and balances on the President?

“A different subject”- like what? I’ve said this over and over, but I lived in the most conservative state in the country and district judges didn’t make decisions that didnt get to federal courts

 

[ElephantStomp]

First of all, I don't believe this to be true. I believe there are people who look at the felonies and accept them and they also want Fauci prosecuted.

Personally, I find that case to be somewhat of a joke. People pay "hush money" all the time. It's nothing new. But here things changed. I believe it boils down to whom.

The "real estate" crimes? A witch hunt in a Kangaroo court.

(Was it the Carroll case where the judge didn't allow exculpatory evidence to be submitted?)

Back to Fauci for a minute. Do you think he could sit down for a second and explain what he's been pardoned for?

The same people that accept the 34 felonies do not want Fauci prosecuted I almost guarantee it. There isn’t people on the right that accept the felonies and want Fauci prosecuted.

I’m sure you find it a joke just as all the other Trump supporters.

Fauci- he know what he was pardoned for, to protect him from that idiot in the White House that has called on people that disagree with him to be prosecuted. The idea that there’s anybody that doesn’t understand that is mind boggling.

 

[Rsedge72]

Was it the Carroll case where the judge didn't allow exculpatory evidence to be submitted?)

Yes

 

[TerryP]

There was a jury of his peers, I mean not bankrupt, shitty business people, but NYC peers.

I was talking about the fraud case against Trump brought by NY. It was not a jury trial.

District judges don’t affect national policy, I mean come on man, it’ll go to court of appeals, then SCOTUS if they choose to hear arguments. Do you disagree with SCOTUS putting checks and balances on the President?

Boasberg with the Alien Enemies Act ruling that it can't be used...district judge.
Haines, out of PA, who ruled the same act can be used...district judge.
Hendrix about deportees facing imminent threats...district judge
The invasion claims stating the administration couldn't remove criminals quickly...district judge.
Abrego Garcia ruling out of MA ... district judge.

You said, "come on." There are your receipts, my friend.

Are you literally asking me if I agree with the Constitution and the separation of powers in the same thread you clearly don't understand how they are being violated?

 

[ElephantStomp]

I was talking about the fraud case against Trump brought by NY. It was not a jury trial.

Boasberg with the Alien Enemies Act ruling that it can't be used...district judge.
Haines, out of PA, who ruled the same act can be used...district judge.
Hendrix about deportees facing imminent threats...district judge
The invasion claims stating the administration couldn't remove criminals quickly...district judge.
Abrego Garcia ruling out of MA ... district judge.

You said, "come on." There are your receipts, my friend.

Are you literally asking me if I agree with the Constitution and the separation of powers in the same thread you clearly don't understand how they are being violated?

The 34 felonies was by a jury trial.

Which are ALL being argued in SCOTUS now…..SCOTUS not the district judges will determine things.

 

[TerryP]

Which are ALL being argued in SCOTUS now…..SCOTUS not the district judges will determine things.

At best this is hyperbole. I seriously doubt, with reason, "ALL" are being argued in front to SCOTUS right now. The information on which cases, and from whom and where, with SCOTUS ... that's not just a simple Google search. It's not easy information to find. My gut instinct tells me you don't have a legitimate source for that statement. If you do, please cite it here.

District judges don’t affect national policy, I mean come on man,

The quote above about SCOTUS proves this to be false. The district judges rules (and we can limit that to the ones cited) have had an affect on the implementation of national policy. IF their rulings didn't have an effect why are those that are, in front of SCOTUS? If they didn't have an effect, there wouldn't be an appeal.