🌎 The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials.

[ElephantStomp]

At best this is hyperbole. I seriously doubt, with reason, "ALL" are being argued in front to SCOTUS right now. The information on which cases, and from whom and where, with SCOTUS ... that's not just a simple Google search. It's not easy information to find. My gut instinct tells me you don't have a legitimate source for that statement. If you do, please cite it here.

The quote above about SCOTUS proves this to be false. The district judges rules (and we can limit that to the ones cited) have had an affect on the implementation of national policy. IF their rulings didn't have an effect why are those that are, in front of SCOTUS? If they didn't have an effect, there wouldn't be an appeal.

SCOTUS is hearing oral arguments about this administration using the Aliens Act, which is the act you cited.

 

[Rsedge72]

, even Jake tapper is saying they lied to us all!!!!!
(About the Covid vaccines)
He’s in CYA mode!!!

Oh and Biden health!!!

 

[footballer]

, even Jake tapper is saying they lied to us all!!!!!
(About the Covid vaccines)
He’s in CYA mode!!!

Oh and Biden health!!!

His eyes lied to him too.

 

[TerryP]

Which are ALL being argued in SCOTUS now

At best this is hyperbole. I seriously doubt, with reason, "ALL" are being argued in front to SCOTUS right now.

SCOTUS is hearing oral arguments about this administration using the Aliens Act, which is the act you cited.

I'm aware as stated earlier. What I still don't comprehend is why you choose to be so emphatic about things that aren't accurate: in this case, yellin' "ALL." Or earlier when saying district judge aren't having an effect.

It's also quite ironic in one thread I read "he isn't doing anything" and any news sites you choose to look at is going to have an article up about how a judge has tried to block, or delay, policy implementation

 

[Rsedge72]

I'm aware as stated earlier. What I still don't comprehend is why you choose to be so emphatic about things that aren't accurate: in this case, yellin' "ALL." Or earlier when saying district judge aren't having an effect.

It's also quite ironic in one thread I read "he isn't doing anything" and any news sites you choose to look at is going to have an article up about how a judge has tried to block, or delay, policy implementation

I think he’s an alter, he has to be trolling everybody. No one, not even the most liberal people I know spews half of the rhetoric he spews.

 

[ElephantStomp]

I'm aware as stated earlier. What I still don't comprehend is why you choose to be so emphatic about things that aren't accurate: in this case, yellin' "ALL." Or earlier when saying district judge aren't having an effect.

It's also quite ironic in one thread I read "he isn't doing anything" and any news sites you choose to look at is going to have an article up about how a judge has tried to block, or delay, policy implementation

District judges won’t have an effect, your side will appeal and they’ll go in front of federal judges. This isn’t real hard to grasp, I don’t know why you’re choosing to ignore that fact, but it is on par with that side of the political spectrum.

 

[TerryP]

District judges won’t have an effect, your side will appeal and they’ll go in front of federal judges. This isn’t real hard to grasp, I don’t know why you’re choosing to ignore that fact, but it is on par with that side of the political spectrum.

This is where you are ignoring the obvious. If they pass a ruling, and they (administration) follows said ruling, they are affecting national policy. You refer to appeal while ignoring what's happened while it's been under appeal. From district judges where the root of the problem exists.

Its, literally, right in front of you.

 

[Krimson]

This is where you are ignoring the obvious. If they pass a ruling, and they (administration) follows said ruling, they are affecting national policy. You refer to appeal while ignoring what's happened while it's been under appeal. From district judges where the root of the problem exists.

Its, literally, right in front of you.

Delay tactics from someone who shouldn't have the power to interfere with national policies.

 

[ElephantStomp]

This is where you are ignoring the obvious. If they pass a ruling, and they (administration) follows said ruling, they are affecting national policy. You refer to appeal while ignoring what's happened while it's been under appeal. From district judges where the root of the problem exists.

It’s, literally, right in front of you.

If my grandmother had wheels she’d be a bike too. This administration and all of it’s unqualified minions aren’t following anything including a SCOTUS ruling

 

[ElephantStomp]

Delay tactics from someone who shouldn't have the power to interfere with national policies.

There has to be checks and balances. I know y’all on the right don’t think so, if it was up to y’all your fake tan leader and all of his yes men and women would be able to do whatever they want and whenever they want.

Just like how y’all don’t see a problem with the plane from the Saudis

 

[Krimson]

There has to be checks and balances. I know y’all on the right don’t think so, if it was up to y’all your fake tan leader and all of his yes men and women would be able to do whatever they want and whenever they want.

Just like how y’all don’t see a problem with the plane from the Saudis

Actually it's Quatar. There are checks and balances as anyone who took civics knows. Three branches of government were installed to ensure that. It's pretty obvious that you don't know what "y'all on the right" actually believe and it's pretty obvious that you fit in with the leftist stereotype. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but you keep proving me wrong

 

[Rsedge72]

The plane was for the US he knows it he’s just pushing buttons.
He didn’t bitch a bit about Schumers rolls Royce. Which by the way was not for the US…

Double standards… oh and the “34”, all where thrown out and no money has to be paid to anyone.

Read a little,

 

[TerryP]

If my grandmother had wheels she’d be a bike too. This administration and all of it’s unqualified minions aren’t following anything including a SCOTUS ruling

Can you cite an example so we can address this point by point?

Now, this is knowing that what you're espousing is also something that the party you support has blatantly ignored.

It's so funny. If a grandma had wheels she'd be a bike...but if a dude has balls he's a woman.

 

[PurlJam]

Can you cite an example so we can address this point by point?

Now, this is knowing that what you're espousing is also something that the party you support has blatantly ignored.

It's so funny. If a grandma had wheels she'd be a bike...but if a dude has balls he's a woman.

That may be one of the best post I've ever seen on here.

 

[ElephantStomp]

Actually it's Quatar. There are checks and balances as anyone who took civics knows. Three branches of government were installed to ensure that. It's pretty obvious that you don't know what "y'all on the right" actually believe and it's pretty obvious that you fit in with the leftist stereotype. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but you keep proving me wrong

I*’m not a leftist first. I made a mistake with calling it Saudi, my apologies. There aren’t checks and balances when you want friendly courts

 

[ElephantStomp]

Can you cite an example so we can address this point by point?

Now, this is knowing that what you're espousing is also something that the party you support has blatantly ignored.

It's so funny. If a grandma had wheels she'd be a bike...but if a dude has balls he's a woman.

Cute and example- Armando Abrego Garcia. SCOTUS told the administration that they needed to facilitate his return to the US and this administration has ignored the ruling so far.

 

[TerryP]

Cute and example- Armando Abrego Garcia. SCOTUS told the administration that they needed to facilitate his return to the US and this administration has ignored the ruling so far.

Okay. Let's go here.

I'll set aside the declaration of the courts in previous hearings...but I won't set aside the audacity. You want our government to tell their government how to handle their own citizens?

How have they not "facilitated" his return?

What are you saying here?

 

[ElephantStomp]

Okay. Let's go here.

I'll set aside the declaration of the courts in previous hearings...but I won't set aside the audacity. You want our government to tell their government how to handle their own citizens?

How have they not "facilitated" his return?

What are you saying here?

No, they’ve not “facilitated” his return, hence why he’s still in the prison there

 

[TerryP]

No, they’ve not “facilitated” his return, hence why he’s still in the prison there

How does a government remove a citizen from another country? When, he is a citizen of that country?

 

[ElephantStomp]

How does a government remove a citizen from another country? When, he is a citizen of that country?

He is an American citizen from Maryland. He was legally here until this administration sent him to El Salvador