šŸŒŽ Ol Tubby

His holding up a new commander of the Marine Corps over something he could’ve fought is ignorant plain and simple.

Don’t like the pentagon’s stance on reproductive health great, he’s a senator fight it, but this isn’t how.

But, we can agree about our taxes going towards defense spending, it should be cut drastically
Defense spending.....
 
But one person is against abortion. One person supports it. If it comes down to my wife or the baby.. who do you think I'll choose I'm this case. Not all abortions are the same.
You'll choose whom?

The law says that in the risk of the life of the mother, rape, or incest, these expenses will be covered.

If you're saying you'd pick the child, in the case of the mother's future being uncertain...I'd hope there's provisions included.

I don't know. Do you?
 
You'll choose whom?

The law says that in the risk of the life of the mother, rape, or incest, these expenses will be covered.

If you're saying you'd pick the child, in the case of the mother's future being uncertain...I'd hope there's provisions included.

I don't know. Do you?
I would choose My wife. My wife would choose her life.
 
His holding up a new commander of the Marine Corps over something he could’ve fought is ignorant plain and simple.

Don’t like the pentagon’s stance on reproductive health great, he’s a senator fight it, but this isn’t how.

But, we can agree about our taxes going towards defense spending, it should be cut drastically
He fought this when it was introduced.
He said he was going to oppose nominations if this happened.

What's ignorant about saying, "I'm going to do this if you do that" and then ... lawd, he did it?

I get the hill the battle is upon ... but good lord, it was coming. Everyone knew it.

And it is not wrong.
 
He fought this when it was introduced.
He said he was going to oppose nominations if this happened.

What's ignorant about saying, "I'm going to do this if you do that" and then ... lawd, he did it?

I get the hill the battle is upon ... but good lord, it was coming. Everyone knew it.

And it is not wrong.
It is wrong.

To say ā€œI don’t like this, so therefore there’ll be no commanders of the armed forcesā€ is the epitome of ignorant.

I knew when I posted it you and I were going to disagree
 
Cut the defense spending and you'll cut my job. You'll cut the budget because with China, North Korea threatening a war.... We can't afford to relax. Where do you cut defense spending? We already had several cuts.. how much you have to cut?
What's ironic about this ... this thread started as a dig against conservatives. Dayum.
It's where the money is spent.

Mind is spinnin' a bit ... what does defense spending have to do with someone getting an abortion for unprotected, or unplanned, pregnancy?
 
What's ironic about this ... this thread started as a dig against conservatives. Dayum.
It's where the money is spent.

Mind is spinnin' a bit ... what does defense spending have to do with someone getting an abortion for unprotected, or unplanned, pregnancy?
Only replying to say I didn’t start this thread as a dig against conservatives only Tubby….hence the name of it being ā€œOl Tubbyā€
 
It is wrong.

To say ā€œI don’t like this, so therefore there’ll be no commanders of the armed forcesā€ is the epitome of ignorant.

I knew when I posted it you and I were going to disagree
We're both calling his point "right." But, it's your choice to label it as ignorant?

It's not the hill, it's the message. His avenue is wrong, the direction is right.
 
The current policy Tubs is objecting to is against the law.

You may not like he's holding up confirmations; I get that. He did warn them several months ago this was coming if they proceeded.

You're still left with his main point: current policy is against the law and it's unconstitutional.
As suspected when I scrolled further down, he cares nothing for the law.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top Bottom