🏈 GAME THREAD New Years Day bowl games--

I didn't have any problem with it as the rule goes. Follow the hit all the way through and it's plenty clear enough. I saw clearly his intentions and he got what he was aiming at when you send the helmet high. Just because these guys quickly come down with a bad case of buyer's remorse after the fact doesn't change it with me.
I already have. The picture that was posted earlier was mine copied from a post in this thread. It doesn't change the fact he led with his shoulder, hit with his shoulder, and the helmet impact followed that. If his intentions, as you see (? really, see intentions?) were to hit him in the targeting area he missed...while looking directly at what he hit.

Hell, White's hit in the MSU game was higher and many came to his defense that it wasn't targeting.

Why they call it isn't lost on me. The ambiguity is what drives me to question just about every targeting call they make. Right now, it's just a bad rule.
 
I already have. The picture that was posted earlier was mine copied from a post in this thread. It doesn't change the fact he led with his shoulder, hit with his shoulder, and the helmet impact followed that. If his intentions, as you see (? really, see intentions?) were to hit him in the targeting area he missed...while looking directly at what he hit.

Hell, White's hit in the MSU game was higher and many came to his defense that it wasn't targeting.

Why they call it isn't lost on me. The ambiguity is what drives me to question just about every targeting call they make. Right now, it's just a bad rule.


If Gibson wants to make a shoulder tackle his helmet isn't straight down the middle. He knows a QB when he sees one and he meant to hit him with the helmet. If he put his head to the back shoulder pad of Burrow we aren't having this discussion. Burrow is at an angle and the back took the same angle with his helmet, nice and high. Not an ounce of remorse for the targeting call from me. In fact, so far, it's been kind of a fun day.
 
@TUSKtimes, How on earth is he supposed to hit the back of the shoulder pads when they are facing each other? I don't get what you're driving at there because it's not part of the play--real or imagined. It simply not possible at that angle.

Look at where his face is buried at initial contact. That's the point here. It's called because the impact led to...and there's the ambiguity.

a.PNG

In fact, so far, it's been kind of a fun day.
It's been a decent football day...a non-emotional day. Outside of the UK vs PSU game it's been a bit bland in my opinion.
 
Would be cool if Kirby switches to Fields for the rest of the half. maybe get some of that backup magic Saban cast in 2018. Would be funny if he did and they started getting beat worse.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom