Just gets old hearing the stupid bullshit on the topic. You take a small sample size of Tua and hold it against Hurts' and you act like Tua has accomplished some monumnetal feat, is a seasoned passer and commander of the offense. Sure, he has looked good, but he's also not been in the fire at all. Hurts has proven he can make plays. Sacked twice and nine hurries has nothing to do with his progressions, it has to do with his offensive line breaking down. Hurts can't force Robert Foster to run a three yard route on 4th down instead of two when the defense is bearing down on him. Hurts can't force a defensive back to not hold Ridley when Ridley has beat them, and only 15 yards come of a potential 40-50 yard pass. In the end, it's just too easy for you to point fingers rather than allow him to work. Instead of bitching about progressions, take a look and see if the line has allowed him to progress. Salad tossers, I don't think so. You just sound like a fucking tool for throwing your team under the bus when they lose. A kindergardener could blame the same talking points you bring up every time with Hurts, it takes actual research and knowledge to look at the whole picture.