From what I've seen the DB's won't be in the picture unless they dump their guy playing safeties over the top. It's designed to hit LB's.In particular, I’m thinking of screens on the perimeter vs DBs. He reminds me a bit of Debo Samuel, the former S. Car APB: a challenge for secondaries to tackle, too shifty and quick for LBs, and interchangeable at either RB or WR.
I had other thoughts but decided to refrain from saying them . I will just say I agree with you that opposing fanbases will have fun taking shots at this.I'm not surprised. A lot of people aren't familiar with him.
The last I saw he was getting fifty thousand plus for appearances.
He's not wrong. If you watch film we're gonna resemble what Georgia does with their linebackers. Lot of the same concepts, and principles in this group. I'm excited to see how they perform this season.
He's not wrong. If you watch film we're gonna resemble what Georgia does with their linebackers. Lot of the same concepts, and principles in this group. I'm excited to see how they perform this season.
Run fits, taking on blocks, blitz concepts, coverage techniques.... we're gonna be doing a lot of the same stuff as Georgia has. And just because the D-line may play differently doesn't mean the linebackers have to. It's all about what you want to accomplish within the scheme. You can have your lineman shoot their gaps in run plays, while having the linebackers scraping over top. Some teams choose both of them to shoot gaps, but I wouldn't recommend that. Our lineman will still have the ability to eat up blocks and allow our linebackers to have space.If the defensive line play is different from one program to the other, how do you make a comparison with the linebackers? Everything changes in my view.
None of it is the same.Run fits, taking on blocks, blitz concepts, coverage techniques.
We're even going to be putting our linebackers at about the dame depth as Georgia does as well, about 4-5 yards behind the line.... instead of 2-3 yards. There's benefits to doing this, and if you want to know(if you already dont that is) why that is, I'll explain.we're gonna be doing a lot of the same stuff as Georgia has.
Boss man, whenever I have the time..... I will show that this is not the case.None of it is the same.
We're also keeping some coverage stuff on the backend as well. The "RIP/LIZ" concept..... which I'm happy we are.None of it is the same.
Only thing I haven't seen so far is if we're gonna pattern match as much as we did with Saban. I'm sure we'll still do it, but anxious to see how much we switch it up with this and going into man coverage.We're also keeping some coverage stuff on the backend as well. The "RIP/LIZ" concept..... which I'm happy we are.
Only thing I haven't seen so far is if we're gonna pattern match as much as we did with Saban. I'm sure we'll still do it, but anxious to see how much we switch it up with this and going into man coverage.
More than likely. But when we play these teams like Tennessee, Texas, etc.... That do all these crossing routes, we might need run it a bit more. We've got the talent to do it.... but it's gonna be tough.
It'll be around game four when we can look at what they are doing.Boss man, whenever I have the time..... I will show that this is not the case.
No matter the scheme, a good defensive line eats up blocks. See Clemson for example, we're more similar to them now as opposed to the two-gap scheme. They were all about plugging their gap and getting upfield.... and they created more than space than any defensive line I can remember. Except for a few Bama teams, and 2021 Georgia. Wilkins and Lawrence were the best at doing this, and I hope our guys perform to that level.As example. Let's go back to what I mentioned about the DL. One is clogging, the other is getting upfield. That effects what the linebackers do in every situation. The "Bandit" concept separates the two.
Clemson, on the DL, a few years ago, is a better example than UGA.No matter the scheme, a good defensive line eats up blocks. See Clemson for example, we're more similar to them now as opposed to the two-gap scheme. They were all about plugging their gap and getting upfield.... and they created more than space than any defensive line I can remember. Except for a few Bama teams, and 2021 Georgia. Wilkins and Lawrence were the best at doing this, and I hope our guys perform to that level.
I'm using it to gauge what we may do under Wommack in the ILB room. We mirror more to what Georgia does at the position, then let's say..... 2018 Clemson, since we're using them as an example on the d-line.Clemson, on the DL, a few years ago, is a better example than UGA.
UofSC employed a version of a 42...I can't remember the year off the top of my head.
In my opinion, you are looking at the end result and drawing comparisons. Not how "the sausage was made."
My point is if the interior pressure is different, everything changes. Clemson doesn't/didn't throw out that Bandit.I'm using it to gauge what we may do under Wommack in the ILB room. We mirror more to what Georgia does at the position, then let's say..... 2018 Clemson, since we're using them as an example on the d-line.