planomateo
Member
Interesting to see perspectives on this topic, some are ok with Dabo making the decision, but not ok with Kelly making a decision. Both are doing what they believe to be the best decision...
I think sitting down with Kelly after his 4th game and laying your cards on the table is the right way to go about it. Kelly might see it as a slap in the face that he's going to most likely lose the starting job... who wouldn't... but isn't it better for Dabo to tell him after the 4th game, rather than waiting until the 6th game? Again, Dabo could have easily strung Kelly along for one more game and had 2 QBs to play with all year long which would have been best for the team, but he instead seems to have laid his cards on the table and let Kelly decide next what is best for him to do.
Agree, can't fault a player for doing what's best for him if the coach is gonna do what's best for the team. Hell, coaches leave programs all the time, schemes change with coaching changes causing players to get the short end of the stick.
I will almost always take the side of the player.

