| FTBL College Football Playoff Rankings Discussions & Updates

Man I get the feeling we are out if SMU loses, can't shake it.

Yea, likely out if SMU loses. Sad but likely happens and we're out of the playoffs. Clearly bad schedules are the way to go. 11-1 against bad teams is better than 10-2 or 9-3 with a top 5 schedule. H2H clearly matters which is nice, but true SoS just puts you in a bad place to lose. Time to drop all the Non-conference games that aren't cakewalks.

This just makes no sense. SMU is ranked poorly with one loss. With two losses they aren’t magically going to be ranked highly among the two loss teams. There are currently only 3 teams ahead of UA with 2 losses… uGA, tOSU, uT. I don’t see the committee saying smu will be in that grade of teams with a loss to #17 Clemson.

Essentially, the ACC game is a play in game. Winner is in, loser is out.
 
This just makes no sense. SMU is ranked poorly with one loss. With two losses they aren’t magically going to be ranked highly among the two loss teams. There are currently only 3 teams ahead of UA with 2 losses… uGA, tOSU, uT. I don’t see the committee saying smu will be in that grade of teams with a loss to #17 Clemson.

Essentially, the ACC game is a play in game. Winner is in, loser is out.
And at that point Bama is in correct?
 
This just makes no sense. SMU is ranked poorly with one loss. With two losses they aren’t magically going to be ranked highly among the two loss teams. There are currently only 3 teams ahead of UA with 2 losses… uGA, tOSU, uT. I don’t see the committee saying smu will be in that grade of teams with a loss to #17 Clemson.

Essentially, the ACC game is a play in game. Winner is in, loser is out.

2 loss vs 3 loss.

Wonder if last year getting bama in over undefeated fsu will factor in... even sub-mentality to some committee members

Oh that Oklahoma fiasco.
 
A 12 team playoff with automatic bid for select conference champs is no different than basketball (someone may get in even if poorly ranked); HOWEVER, the similarity ends because in basketball they would be seeded appropriately, not getting a BYE.
 
2 loss vs 3 loss.

Wonder if last year getting bama in over undefeated fsu will factor in... even sub-mentality to some committee members

Oh that Oklahoma fiasco.
3 loss Alabama is currently ranked ahead of almost every 2 loss team, sans uGA, uT and OSU.... so are you saying a 2 loss SMU would be in that caliber of team in the committee's mind? Currently they are not since all three of those 2 loss teams are ranked ahead of 1 loss SMU... They have zero wins vs any ranked teams and you're thinking another loss to a 17th ranked team would keep them in the playoffs?

SMU's currently poor ranking as a one loss teams shows me the committee agrees with my thinking and they are not going to be a highly ranked 2 loss team. If they do lose, I would expect SMU to be in the 15-17 ranking if not even worse for the final ranking system.
 
Last edited:
It will be close if Clemson were to beat SMU, but I think 94 brings up a good point with the caliber of 2 loss teams currently ranked ahead of Bama.

SMU’s best win would be Bama’s 5th best win. A 7 point win @ Louisville.

We have two bad losses, no doubt, but that many more quality wins has to carry weight.

SMU’s 2nd best win…tough to find one. Probably TCU. After that it all .500ish teams.
 
Yeah but if thing hold “pat” bamas in. Now if Clemson beats smu, there’s a chance smu stays ahead of bama. Slim or not it’s still a possibility. Now in a crazy situation (although highly unlikely) Boise st loses to unlv, then we’ll still need to wait out the committee’s decision there also. The rest of the championship games don’t really matter, because all those teams involved are in no matter what.
 
Back
Top Bottom