LOL, I understood the 1st time and the logic was sound. I was losing my mind watching those careless TOs and in my own logical mind blamed you. By no means do I have a PHD in Bama basketball/Nate Oats’offensive scheme; but I did pass Basketball 101 (C+).
The first comment, as well as the second, wasn't necessarily meant "at you."
(NUMBERS: Last night, in the first half, UArk had seven points off of TO's versus the eight assists for Bama. In the second half UArk had six off of turnovers versus nine assists by the Tide. At the very least it's a 13:28 scoring advantage for Bama.)
The careless TO's
should bother even the oldest "FOG's." They don't sit well with me either; things like Mark getting trapped by a triple-team in the paint that leads to a turnover (because the lanes are covered. See Ole Miss and their defense against Bama.) I don't like it, but I don't get upset about them either.
This offense works at its best when it's a "feed/dribble drive to the paint, kick it out."
Just a side note, random observation kind of thing to chew on.
If I'm not mistaken they had nine in the first, five in the second, which resulted in 14 TO's for the game. Take those numbers and put them in context with something Oats said last night (and other nights.)
We've heard him talk on intensity; specifically keeping the same intensity. Yesterday he didn't mention "intensity," but he felt they "relaxed" in the second (allowing that 12 point run.) Relaxed, which meant a slower pace of play on both ends, and it just so happens it led to fewer TO's in the second.
In a hypothetical world we as fans are left with two choices. One, love the fast pace of play and accept the TO's or focus more on the TO's and lose the pace.