As I see it, there are far too many different circumstances to compare any of these coaches with each other. Now, Williams has had a bad start to the 2014-2015 season but digress?
By digress, I'm specifically referring to UT's conference record the last four years. 14 wins followed by 10, 11, and then 8.
Grant sits at 12, then 8, 12, and this year's total of 7. Up and down, inconsistent. Digression? The 12 last season disputes that.
Williams? He's actually won big, and won big at more than one school—Kansas and UNC for goodness sake. Two basketball schools that nary a school in the SEC, save UK, even belong in the same conversation. Hell Stomp, his accomplishments are graded by NCAA appearances.
As to Williams and digression...conference wins over the last four years are 14, 14, 12, and 13. How's that digression?
I've not seen anything (as of this morning) that leads me to believe Auburn is going to, or has a chance of, trying to get the show cause order changed.
I'm not saying Pearl isn't a decent basketball coach. I am saying that while it's a solid hire, I don't see it as a hire that's going to change the landscape of the SEC. It reminds me of Arkansas hiring Petrino and how so many claimed that was going to put them in the drivers seat in the SEC—yet he couldn't win the big ones.
I very well could be wrong about how well he does at Auburn. We'll soon see. It's not something I'm overly concerned about—just like everything else at Auburn.