<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention -->@cjaytch<!-- END TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention -->
Something that crossed my mind this morning.
I ran across a report (on basketball forum) about how Louisville has roughly twice the amount of revenue in basketball as Kentucky. One of the points the article brings up is some credit the difference to alcohol sales.
Circling back around to this thread...
We live in the middle of the Bible belt. We have a lot of people whomaintain the stance they don't believe in drinking alcoholādespite the fact they do in their own circlesāand would likely have a stance against the sell of beer at football games.
I makes me wonder if that would have an affect on donations to the athletic department.
Good points. To demonstrate the "Bible Belt" mindset of silliness:
There is a BBQ/bar joint near my house. Its been there probably 60 years. It has always sold alcohol. Everyone, even the non-drinker folks love the BBQ. They actually installed a take-out entrance in the back of the building (im assuming decades ago) so that good church people can come in and buy their BBQ and not have to be in the "bar" area where all the heathens eat. Other variations of the story say that its so the church folks wont be seen entering the bar. I've never confirmed this is true but its what everyone around here says is the story behind the weird back entrance to this place.
Whatever the University decides is fine with me because it wont affect me one way or the other. They don't allow alcohol now and the stadium has a bunch of drunk jerks so I don't see how much would change if they did allow it.