📡 Ah, the unintended consequences of the Transfer Portal rear their heads.

TerryP

Successfully wasting your time since...
Staff
Over the last week I've heard three of the 'talking heads' on ESPN's College Football Live talk about these kids entering the transfer portal because of competition. It's been labeled as "being scared of the competition." It's been labeled as "being too impatient to deal with the competition." We've seen a lot of other labels assigned to these kids on different forums like this one.

What I'd like to point out is who these new "takes" are coming from along with the fact this is what we've been pointing to all along.

We talk about Anoma but kids who've just signed in February and are already in the portal hasn't been mentioned a lot. Recently, after Oregon hired the long time Oklahoma assistant softball coach to take over the Duck program, they had over a dozen enter the portal--three of whom are pitchers.

I've said all along...going all the way back to the days when these summer-traveling camps were hitting the southeast...this is a zero sum game. There are no more opportunities in number. There are very few better opportunities IF you're afforded one.

Now, we're seeing that idea suggested as a "counter measure," so to speak.

The scholarship doesn't have to be renewed in the coming class once they enter the portal.
I'm leaning towards the idea that when you enter the portal, there are consequences.

It's also being suggested by the national media. They're cautioning kids "be careful, you might not have a scholarship if you enter the portal." And, by all means, I can see why a school would do such.

What's the recipe to fix this growing problem?

I'll leave you with what Tom Lugenbill suggested to Trevor Matich yesterday along with a thought on his opinion.

Tom: There's needs to be a time limit. Let's make it two or three days.
Trevor: I believe it needs to be longer. They need the time to make their decision.
Tom: They should have already researched that before hand.
A time limit is a good suggestion. However, as Tom suggests, that's impossible because the players can't talk to other teams without permission, and that permission comes with being in the portal.

I hesitate a bit on "they need time to make their decision." Yes, that's true. However, I come back to they've through this once so if we're going to allow a recent signee to transfer, what more is there for him to know? All of these pressures were supposed to be softened by having an early signing date, remember? It was intended to allow kids to make better decisions with less pressure.

On a note I consider to be somewhat ironic and definitely mind-boggling...

Mantra 1: Schools should be forced to give student athletes four year scholarships.
Manta 2: Schools should be forced to allow student athletes to leave any time they want.
 
In the last 10 minutes I've heard "the early signing day means coaches don't have to hold the recruits hand through December and January."

In the last 10 weeks we've seen the transfer portal means coaches have to hold players hands for four and five years.

But, it's also easier on coaching staff's?

Hard to see it any different from Kendell Sheffield, or Alvin Kamara, or anyone else. Re-recruiting guys to the program has been around a while. Having 24 players in the barn and the #1 recruiting class sewed up feels good to me. Kids immediately entering the portal before they unpack they seem to be giving the impression they were rushed. Players will just have to figure it out. I think coach Saban already has.
 
Last edited:
In the last 10 minutes I've heard "the early signing day means coaches don't have to hold the recruits hand through December and January."

In the last 10 weeks we've seen the transfer portal means coaches have to hold players hands for four and five years.

But, it's also easier on coaching staff's?

The portal doesn't really change anything that has been going on for years.... However, it allows two things. The Team/Coaches to know that a player is looking and have the option to move that scholarship to someone else and secondly allows the player to have "official" contact with other programs.

Prior, this was all done behind the "eyes" of the current program and the NCAA. Now, it's down with both parties out front. I think that gives both the players and the teams/coaches a understanding where everything stands. I'm 100% for the portal; however, I'm not for transfer without sitting. I think the way the rules are now, is about correct (for once with the NCAA). Players who graduate should be able to transfer without sitting. Players who don't should have to sit. The implementation of the portal makes it a better situation for both the school and the kid transferring and I'm fine with there being consequences to going into the portal. It isn't something that should be enter lightly.
 
Should coaches be required to sit out a year if they violate their contracts to go to another school?

As stated by @TerryP , they do as outlined in their contracts.

The kids are given 5 to play 4 so they have a built in year they can sit and still use all their 4 years. They also have the option to graduate early and have no penalty on transfer. Kids also leave early for the NFL after 3 years... There are pros/cons on all sides Coaching/Players/Colleges in how things are setup. For the most part, I think it's a pretty good and equatable system.

The only area I would like to some changes is in options on allowing kids to transfer without penalty IF the school signs off on it. That way, if a kid doesn't fit the system on a coaching change OR if a kid get buried in the depth chart AND the school is in agreement to allow a kid to transfer, there should be no penalty. I'm not sure how best to implement something like that, but there should be an option when all parties agree to release a kid.
 
Last edited:
Free agency.


1400 at the beginning of January, according to Butch Davis. It's higher now.

“In the first of January, there were 1,400 kids who hit the [transfer] portal. In the middle of January, there were 1,700. Now there are close to 2,000. There are only 350 scholarships available … so where are those other kids going to go?

 
As stated by @TerryP , they do as outlined in their contracts.

The kids are given 5 to play 4 so they have a built in year they can sit and still use all their 4 years. They also have the option to graduate early and have no penalty on transfer. Kids also leave early for the NFL after 3 years... There are pros/cons on all sides Coaching/Players/Colleges in how things are setup. For the most part, I think it's a pretty good and equatable system.

The only area I would like to some changes is in options on allowing kids to transfer without penalty IF the school signs off on it. That way, if a kid doesn't fit the system on a coaching change OR if a kid get buried in the depth chart AND the school is in agreement to allow a kid to transfer, there should be no penalty. I'm not sure how best to implement something like that, but there should be an option when all parties agree to release a kid.
That's good on a four year scholarship. Good info. I thought some of the scholarships were only one year. In that case, immediate transfer should be allowed, right?
 
That's good on a four year scholarship. Good info. I thought some of the scholarships were only one year. In that case, immediate transfer should be allowed, right?

1 year renewable is the standard, but to not renew required a reason. The athlete could appeal to a review board and the coach would have to show cause/reason why the scholarship was removed (grades, lack of following team rules, ect.). This didn't happen often... They have since come out with "4 year" scholarships, but it has the same removal requirements... so they were always the basic same thing.... just a "marketing" term to help sell your program over another.

The NCAA has always had a 1 year in residence rule in regards to football, baseball, basketball for non-graduate transfers unless you get some sort of hardship waiver regardless of your scholarship offer, and that includes non-scholarship athletes that have participated or been recruited. In other sports they offer a 1 time transfer exemption if you meet certain criteria.
 
Last edited:


Write your reply...
Back
Top Bottom