Well, to be fair, those who have criticized Saban for "abusing" his players have done so with RB in mind on offense and defense more generally. I wonder if (a) the supposed complexity of Saban's defense is to blame for him "overusing" his starting defensive personnel, and if so, if (b) Pruitt's attempt to simplify the defense is an intentional effort to spread more defensive reps around to the reserve players, especially given the prominence of the HUNH.
Not sure the assumptions ever verify the reality. What running backs should we consider to have been overused? Derrick Henry's Heisman year is just about where the argument would start and end. And even then what did he do his freshman and sophomore year in actual reps? Is this abuse we're looking at an actual one-year sample size? Give me a program that features a strong pro set running game that ran their backs any less than Bama? LSU, Arkansas, Wisconsin? 2008 it was Coffee, Ingram, Upshaw and Grant. 2009, it was Ingram, Richardson, Upchurch, Grant, Goode. 2010 it was Richardson, Ingram, Lacy, Goode. You know who's been here. Except for Henry's junior campaign, which is only a one-year sample size, what are we doing with our guys at running back that's causing so much attrition at the next level?
On defense, I can only hope we continue to simplify the concepts and it probably has helped us get more guys on the field. Again, it's hard to over react when so many of our defensive guys have gone in the first and second rounds of the draft and more than a few have reached all-pro level. Hightower, Mosley, Collins, Clinton-Dix, Barron, Johnson, they don't look burned out to me.