X
You also support a warmonger in Cheney. Not surprised to be frank. We're in a war with Russia. Why?
BTW, there's a lot that fall under this umbrella I call "warmongers." On both sides of the proverbial aisle.I support Ukraine and their efforts against an invasion by the communist jackoff.
I also fully support sending them weapons to defeat said communist jackoff
Putin: "probably only slightly worse than the US government"You do realize they are not communist now, right? He maybe authoritarian but probably only slightly worse than the US government. Can you honestly say that this war of his is worse than the many ones of ours?
BINGO!!!!!BTW, there's a lot that fall under this umbrella I call "warmongers." On both sides of the proverbial aisle.
The "fully support" is intriguing when you have outlets like CBS reporting only 30% is actually making it to the front lines.
I still stand by we don't need to be there, don't need to be spending that kind of money, and if they are hell bent on spending do it here.
You are a consumer of propaganda and judge everything through government approved media. It could be said that you lack objectivity. You sling the conspiracy label as an attempt to delegitimize the person not the argument.Putin: "probably only slightly worse than the US government"
That says everything as to how quickly you seize upon every deep state conspiracy to explain world events.
I don’t care about your delusions.
Oh you’re wrong there, I don’t support Cheney.You also support a warmonger in Cheney. Not surprised to be frank. We're in a war with Russia. Why?
I agree we should spend more here, but the issue is unless repubs get to spend it their way they won’t support the current admin in doing anything just like when it’s a Repub president the dems don’t support their agendaBTW, there's a lot that fall under this umbrella I call "warmongers." On both sides of the proverbial aisle.
The "fully support" is intriguing when you have outlets like CBS reporting only 30% is actually making it to the front lines.
I still stand by we don't need to be there, don't need to be spending that kind of money, and if they are hell bent on spending do it here.
Yes I realize that. He’s communist, authoritarian, any other description you want to use.You do realize they are not communist now, right? He maybe authoritarian but probably only slightly worse than the US government. Can you honestly say that this war of his is worse than the many ones of ours?
The issue, as I see this, is whether the United States shouldn't be involved in this. Spending billions on a country that can be argued as one of the most corrupt in history is a small part of the story. Why are we in a proxy war with Russia?I agree we should spend more here, but the issue is unless repubs get to spend it their way they won’t support the current admin in doing anything just like when it’s a Repub president the dems don’t support their agenda
Here is Gideon Rose former editor of Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations) appearing on the old Colbert Report from 2014 trying to sell and popularize US/NATO Ukraine policy. Rogan and Smith play the actual clip in real time.
If short on time, move ahead to about the 4 min mark. This whole 14 min clip is a great commentary on US foreign policy, if you have the time.
Here is prescient analysis from Professor Mearsheimer back in 2015.