💬 The future of donations to College Athletics - Republican tax overhaul will have an impact

No point in arguing with the unwilling. They have dug their feet in and refuse to listen to logic. He is not an economist, accountant, financial adviser, or anything else that has a clue of the implications overall of what is happening to Americans other than themselves, so you toss him into the group that doesn't understand how their own taxes and the tax code works. They see what they want to see and will not allow anything to change their mind. It's the definition of insanity.

I love how the rich are evil because they make money, work their asses off to earn it, and are the devil because they don't walk down the street handing it out to those that didn't get an education, didn't make the most of theirselves, and anyone else that didn't capitalize on what this country offers. You don't get rich working from 9-5. if you don't know that, then that's your problem. The rich work 70, 80, 90 ,100 hours a week, yet you think it's wrong they make so much money and that it's not showing in your pocket. Well I got news for you sport, without the rich, you'd be out of a job, because a "rich corporation" most likely owns your company that probably started by an individual with great motivation. But hey, whatever keeps you energized and waking up each and every day. I personally would rather be spending these days getting excited about Santa Clause, smelling cookies, and happy I'm alive and healthy. But different strokes for different folks.
 
While I'm happy for the people that are getting bonuses right now. Let me ask you, though, why do you think that happened? Was it AT&T and Comcast saying "HEY LOOK WE ARE GOING TO BE GIVING YOU GUYS SO MUCH MORE MONEY?!" or was it that they want to make it appear that way? Why? Because they just bought and paid for the death of Net Neutrality? They have a MASSIVE merger they wont to get done and the govt. has to sign off on? Not to mention almost immediately AT&T announced 300 layoffs and that they are jacking up prices.


Lol.

Net neutrality was all about Gestapo-style censorship of conservative voices through virtue-signaling, thanks to Obumma. Has nothing to do with prices or mergers. But, keep believing the smoke-and-mirrors commentary from Scarredbro and Rachel Madcow. If it was really about "levelling the playing field" like you and all the left assert, then why do the telecom and silicon giants pretty much control the web? The big 3 of Facebook, Google, and Twitter are all guilty of censorship, and that is DOCUMENTED. Really, it's pushing Anti-trust violations. And how does Amazon's market control of e-commerce level the playing field? Let's not also forget Bezos' multi-million dollar contract with the CIA.

You are so blind, dude. Utterly blind.

And before you start echo-chambering leftist bullshit, look no further than the FCC commish's comments on net neutrality.
 
The Mercedes operation is a good example of how it should work.....The state gave up a lot to get MB to come to Alabama no doubt but again the big thing is the checks they write each week to Ben and Jerry !!!!! Those workers buy food/cars/houses/go to college and the dollar is shared by many many people. The GD government should be doing all they can to help business grow more so they can hire more associates. It's not the taxes that business pay that should be the KEY...it's the checks they write each week that is the Key.

Think about this...we all love Bama football yet each Saturday our Team runs out dressed in uniforms made in F TimbuckTwo while we wear 80 buck Nike gameday shirts made in the same town as the uniforms. Why can't Nike make those uniforms in Opp, Alabama or Jackson, Miss?

That is what The Don is trying to get done but the Globalist fight him 24/7/365. Apple wants your business but the gay guy wants everything made in China but he wants you to buy it! F him and the rest of the globalist.
 
Adding 1.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years to a national debt that currently stands at 20.6 trillion dollars. How is this a victory for the American people? Any business that runs a deficit ultimately fails. At some point in time, this all comes crashing down and the American people will be the ones that suffer because I'm sure the politicians will have covered their asses. It saddens me to know that as Americans, we are letting politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, drive this country towards peril. Yet, Americans are too busy debating the merits of their respective political affiliations. How about saying, I'm an American, not a Republican or Democrat, and lets do whats best for the people of this country, because if you take the blinders off, its not hard to see that we are losing.
 
Last edited:
The Mercedes operation is a good example of how it should work.....The state gave up a lot to get MB to come to Alabama no doubt but again the big thing is the checks they write each week to Ben and Jerry !!!!! Those workers buy food/cars/houses/go to college and the dollar is shared by many many people. The GD government should be doing all they can to help business grow more so they can hire more associates. It's not the taxes that business pay that should be the KEY...it's the checks they write each week that is the Key.

Think about this...we all love Bama football yet each Saturday our Team runs out dressed in uniforms made in F TimbuckTwo while we wear 80 buck Nike gameday shirts made in the same town as the uniforms. Why can't Nike make those uniforms in Opp, Alabama or Jackson, Miss?

That is what The Don is trying to get done but the Globalist fight him 24/7/365. Apple wants your business but the gay guy wants everything made in China but he wants you to buy it! F him and the rest of the globalist.

And Tuscaloosa's economy has BOOMED as a result. Not just Mercedes and their couple thousand employees, but all the supplier plants have added 30k+ jobs to the Tuscaloosa area.

And by default, the state's economy has boomed also with Honda and Hyundai coming in also.
 
Last edited:
No point in arguing with the unwilling. They have dug their feet in and refuse to listen to logic. He is not an economist, accountant, financial adviser, or anything else that has a clue of the implications overall of what is happening to Americans other than themselves, so you toss him into the group that doesn't understand how their own taxes and the tax code works. They see what they want to see and will not allow anything to change their mind. It's the definition of insanity.

I love how the rich are evil because they make money, work their asses off to earn it, and are the devil because they don't walk down the street handing it out to those that didn't get an education, didn't make the most of theirselves, and anyone else that didn't capitalize on what this country offers. You don't get rich working from 9-5. if you don't know that, then that's your problem. The rich work 70, 80, 90 ,100 hours a week, yet you think it's wrong they make so much money and that it's not showing in your pocket. Well I got news for you sport, without the rich, you'd be out of a job, because a "rich corporation" most likely owns your company that probably started by an individual with great motivation. But hey, whatever keeps you energized and waking up each and every day. I personally would rather be spending these days getting excited about Santa Clause, smelling cookies, and happy I'm alive and healthy. But different strokes for different folks.


560.jpg
 
If GDP remains above three percent we'll have good job growth and the deficit will be less than projected. If it starts nudging four percent, the additional revenue will reduce the deficit. I don't think anyone believes this will generate more momentum than that.

As to last month's video of CEOs saying they won't hire or build or spend should the tax plan be enacted - that's probably an honest response of CEOs who wouldn't commit to anything off the cuff. AT&T, Fifth Third, Boeing and Wells all announced initiatives yesterday. Wells and Fifth Third will institute a $15 minimum wage, 300,000 ATT/Comcast employees are getting immediate $1,000 bonuses (the union wants more).

I think someone mentioned the greedy corporations would just stash more money overseas. There is less of an incentive to do that now, and an opportunity to repatriate funds. Both are good developments for domestic economic activity. How they employ funds will be key. The stock market run-up has made buybacks less attractive.

Thankful for Massive Tax Cut, AT&T, Wells Fargo Promise to Share the Wealth

Thankful for Massive Tax Cut, AT&T, Wells Fargo Promise to Share the Wealth

President Donald Trump has yet to sign the tax overhaul that promises to slash corporate taxes, but several big U.S. companies raced to tout plans to dole out some of the expected windfall

AT&T said it would pay a $1,000 bonus to most of its U.S. workers. PHOTO: STEPHANIE KEITH/REUTERS
By Theo Francis
Dec. 20, 2017 7:26 p.m. ET

President Donald Trump hasn’t yet signed the tax overhaul that promises to slash corporate taxes, but several big U.S. companies raced Wednesday to tout plans to dole out some of the expected windfall.

AT&T Inc. and Comcast Corp. said they would pay a $1,000 bonusto most of their U.S. workers—more than 300,000 people combined—once the president signs the legislation. Wells Fargo & Co. and Fifth Third Bancorp FITB -0.36%said they would raise their minimum wage to $15 an hour.
The moves came within hours of a final vote in the House to adopt the legislation, which would reduce the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% and make other sweeping changes expected to cost $1.5 trillion over the next decade. The Senate passed the bill a day earlier, and Mr. Trump is expected to sign it, though perhaps not until early January.

Telecoms and banks are among those expected to get a huge boost from the overhaul since most of their operations are domestic and they pay higher effective rates than internet or pharmaceutical firms that have intellectual property or operations outside the country.
In a statement, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson was effusive in his praise for the bill, saying Congress and Mr. Trump “took a monumental step” to align U.S. taxes with those of other industrialized countries.

A few weeks ago, Mr. Stephenson was sparring with the Trump administration after the Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit to block AT&T’s takeover of Time Warner Inc. He broached the question of whether the White House meddled in the process and said he didn’t know the answer. The Justice Department said there was no political interference.

Mr. Trump, in celebrating the bill’s passage in Congress in a White House event, highlighted AT&T’s pledge to give bonuses and increase spending. “That’s because of what we did, so that’s pretty good,” he said.
The mutual admiration comes after a year in which the relationship between the White House and U.S. business leaders has often proved tumultuous. Two CEO advisory panels disbanded earlier this yearafter members began announcing they would leave the bodies in protest of Mr. Trump’s response to a white supremacist march that turned deadly in Charlottesville, Va.
But American companies stand to benefit from the Republican tax overhaul as well as extensive efforts to cut back regulations across industries—initiatives that executives have sought to support even as they sometimes kept their distance from the president in public.
In announcing its bonus, Comcast cited both the tax cut and the Federal Communications Commission’s recent decision to roll back net neutrality regulations.

Economists and some policy makers have questioned the degree to which companies will use the savings from the tax bill to invest in the U.S. or create jobs, as opposed to buying back shares or paying dividends to shareholders.
Congressional Democrats are highlighting the risk that companies don’t ramp up hiring and investment. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) circulated a list of more than 30 large public companies that have announced a combined $83.7 billion in share buybacks since the Senate passed its version of the tax overhaul in early December.

“There is a reason so few executives have said the tax bill will lead to more jobs, investments and higher wages,” Mr. Schumer’s communications director, Matt House, wrote in an email to reporters. “It will actually lead to share buybacks, corporate bonuses and dividends.”
Companies discussing their buybacks in conference calls during this period didn’t tie the announcements to the tax bill. Some, including Honeywell International Inc., explicitly said they hadn’t determined how they would use foreign assets once they had paid a one-time tax. Through Sept. 30, share buybacks have generally been declining among S&P 500 companies since about mid-2016.

On Wednesday, AT&T said it would pay its special bonus to more than 200,000 union and nonunion employees and front-line managers.
The Communications Workers of America union recognized the payouts, though it has also attacked the GOP bill as skewed toward corporate interests and the wealthy. Labor groups have asked corporations, including AT&T, to give employees a $4,000 wage increase once the tax cuts pass, citing an amount the Trump administration has said would flow to workers.

“While I’m never going to turn down money for our members, $1,000 is a drop in the bucket,” compared with companies’ benefit from the tax plan, CWA President Chris Shelton said in an interview. “We won’t rest until we get at least what they promised.”
CWA has backed the AT&T takeover of Time Warner and recently reached a tentative labor agreement boosting pay and job protections for about 21,000 of its wireless workers. Those employees would get an extra $1,000 ratification bonus if they approve the new contract.
BoeingCo., another firm expecting a big reduction in its tax bill, said Wednesday it will inject $300 million of its savings into employee-related activities, split equally between training, facilities upgrades and supporting charitable gift-match programs.

Wells Fargo plans to increase its minimum hourly wage to $15 from $13.50, a move that will affect 36,000 workers. In addition to raising its minimum wage for 3,000 workers, Fifth Third said it would give more than 13,500 of its 18,000 employees a one-time $1,000 bonus.
Fifth Third finance chief Tayfun Tuzun said in early December that he expected the bank’s effective tax rate would fall from about 26% or 27% to 12.5% or 13.5%. He also estimated that the bank would have a net gain of $240 million to $265 million. At the time, he expected the majority of the bank’s tax benefit to go to the bottom line. The bank said on Wednesday the pay raises would cost $23.6 million.
—Drew FitzGerald, Rachel Louise Ensign and Christina Rexrode contributed to this article.
Appeared in the December 21, 2017, print edition as 'Firms Plan to Share Wealth.'

Also, Comcast announced a 50B+ infrastructure plan in light of both the new tax package, AND the "repeal" of Net Neutrality...

As Soon as Trump-Backed Tax Bill Passed, Comcast Makes a Huge $50B+ Announcement
 
This weeping and gnashing of teeth by the left is humorous in several ways but what befuddles me most is their apparent belief that the poor, ailing, benevolent federal government is going to have to dig into its personal account to meet the requirements of this rotten tax bill. IT’S OUR MONEY!! THEY DON’T HAVE MONEY WITHOUT US!! They’re just going to allow us to keep more of OUR money. This life sucking behemoth that resides in D.C. created ALL of the problems we have now. From the moment the central government began usurping state sovereignty (issues of human rights excluded) and decided it should do more than provide a standing military, maintain roads/bridges, manage interstate commerce and collect just enough taxes to complete those tasks we’ve been off the rails.
 
Lol.

Net neutrality was all about Gestapo-style censorship of conservative voices through virtue-signaling, thanks to Obumma. Has nothing to do with prices or mergers. But, keep believing the smoke-and-mirrors commentary from Scarredbro and Rachel Madcow. If it was really about "levelling the playing field" like you and all the left assert, then why do the telecom and silicon giants pretty much control the web? The big 3 of Facebook, Google, and Twitter are all guilty of censorship, and that is DOCUMENTED. Really, it's pushing Anti-trust violations. And how does Amazon's market control of e-commerce level the playing field? Let's not also forget Bezos' multi-million dollar contract with the CIA.

You are so blind, dude. Utterly blind.

And before you start echo-chambering leftist bullshit, look no further than the FCC commish's comments on net neutrality.

You have 100% absolutely no idea wtf net neutrality even is. Get back to me when you cant binge watch Sasquatch Hunters or whatever the shit it is you people watch on Netflix anymore because Comcast decided to slow their speeds down to nothing because Amazon pays them more. Let me know how that goes for you when you cant pull up your email account because Verizon slowed down yahoo's speed to a snails pace because Google pays them more. Or when you cant seem to get Ebay to work anymore because Amazon's pockets are so deep.

The FCC commish, you mean the scumbag behind destroying net neutrality? The scumbag that got rid of internet privacy and security rules? The scumbag thats been going on TV the last 11 months lying every week? Yeah, look no further. People like him are why people like you have no clue what net neutrality actually is.
 
You have 100% absolutely no idea wtf net neutrality even is. Get back to me when you cant binge watch Sasquatch Hunters or whatever the shit it is you people watch on Netflix anymore because Comcast decided to slow their speeds down to nothing because Amazon pays them more. Let me know how that goes for you when you cant pull up your email account because Verizon slowed down yahoo's speed to a snails pace because Google pays them more. Or when you cant seem to get Ebay to work anymore because Amazon's pockets are so deep.

The FCC commish, you mean the scumbag behind destroying net neutrality? The scumbag that got rid of internet privacy and security rules? The scumbag thats been going on TV the last 11 months lying every week? Yeah, look no further. People like him are why people like you have no clue what net neutrality actually is.
Not agreeing with you. There is so much competition in the internet biz and lightning changes in technology that we will have many choices. They are cheaper and cheaper. The newest wireless stuff is faster than wire and net neutrality just don't matter because you can connect multiple nodes together to make things work. This is the business I am in. The cost per megabyte is lower and that is only getting better.
 
You have 100% absolutely no idea wtf net neutrality even is. Get back to me when you cant binge watch Sasquatch Hunters or whatever the shit it is you people watch on Netflix anymore because Comcast decided to slow their speeds down to nothing because Amazon pays them more. Let me know how that goes for you when you cant pull up your email account because Verizon slowed down yahoo's speed to a snails pace because Google pays them more. Or when you cant seem to get Ebay to work anymore because Amazon's pockets are so deep.

The FCC commish, you mean the scumbag behind destroying net neutrality? The scumbag that got rid of internet privacy and security rules? The scumbag thats been going on TV the last 11 months lying every week? Yeah, look no further. People like him are why people like you have no clue what net neutrality actually is.
Net neutrality just means that if you decide to start your own internet service with 100% of your money, you have to provide access to dip$hits that can't pay. It's a dumbass business plan. If you feel sorry for them then write a check. It's a free country. While you're at it, send your new tax break money to DC.
 
You have 100% absolutely no idea wtf net neutrality even is. Get back to me when you cant binge watch Sasquatch Hunters or whatever the shit it is you people watch on Netflix anymore because Comcast decided to slow their speeds down to nothing because Amazon pays them more. Let me know how that goes for you when you cant pull up your email account because Verizon slowed down yahoo's speed to a snails pace because Google pays them more. Or when you cant seem to get Ebay to work anymore because Amazon's pockets are so deep.

The FCC commish, you mean the scumbag behind destroying net neutrality? The scumbag that got rid of internet privacy and security rules? The scumbag thats been going on TV the last 11 months lying every week? Yeah, look no further. People like him are why people like you have no clue what net neutrality actually is.
Yep.

The space between your ears is a resonant echo chamber, void of the ability of independent observation. Only collectivism.
 
Net neutrality just means that if you decide to start your own internet service with 100% of your money, you have to provide access to dip$hits that can't pay. It's a dumbass business plan. If you feel sorry for them then write a check. It's a free country. While you're at it, send your new tax break money to DC.

LMAO No it is not. WTF?! Where do you guys come up with this shit? Net Neutrality simply means internet providers have to treat all data the same. Meaning they cant slow down one customer because it has a lot more traffic than say you do. Or it block you from seeing Amazon or Netflix or the government's website. It has to provide the same ACCESS for all data. And what am I writing a check for there? Pretty much nothing you said made a lick of sense.

I'd rather they take my little extra 20 bucks every month and put into the schools or roads or that infrastructure bill that Trump claimed he would do.
 
Not agreeing with you. There is so much competition in the internet biz and lightning changes in technology that we will have many choices. They are cheaper and cheaper. The newest wireless stuff is faster than wire and net neutrality just don't matter because you can connect multiple nodes together to make things work. This is the business I am in. The cost per megabyte is lower and that is only getting better.

Net Neutrality has absolutely nothing with wired or wireless internet or who has the best equipment. This is my entire point. Your arguing about something that you are clueless about. Why do I get the feeling that most of you conservatives hear the term "net neutrality" and automatically you get mad at the word "neutrality"?
 
LMAO No it is not. WTF?! Where do you guys come up with this shit? Net Neutrality simply means internet providers have to treat all data the same. Meaning they cant slow down one customer because it has a lot more traffic than say you do. Or it block you from seeing Amazon or Netflix or the government's website. It has to provide the same ACCESS for all data. And what am I writing a check for there? Pretty much nothing you said made a lick of sense.

I'd rather they take my little extra 20 bucks every month and put into the schools or roads or that infrastructure bill that Trump claimed he would do.
Is all data the same?

How did the internet work before Net Neutrality?
 
Net Neutrality has absolutely nothing with wired or wireless internet or who has the best equipment. This is my entire point. Your arguing about something that you are clueless about. Why do I get the feeling that most of you conservatives hear the term "net neutrality" and automatically you get mad at the word "neutrality"?
Sorry that I gave you the real underlying issue that the last mile of internet keeps access away from some folks that just don't live in the city. If providers invest in their bandwidth 100 percent then they should have a sayso about who uses it. If you don't like a provider it is easy to change today because of the new technology. We have several wireless providers that have purchased their 100mb pipe and then resells it to customers. I don't believe you are looking at the real issue. It is that If I pay I should be the one that determines how much I let you have vs someone else. It is my bandwidth and my investment. Not yours, and not the governments. Just a few years ago a T-1 cost over $500 per month. 1.5mb Now you can purchase 100mb for that same money and in some cities a full gigabit. Why would I want the government to mandate that i wouldn't be able to control who uses it. Right now I have the right to not sell a call center telephone lines on my network because they would use up the resources more than a normal business. We call it shaping. It keeps our system in balance so that we don't have to buy extra lines.
 
Sorry that I gave you the real underlying issue that the last mile of internet keeps access away from some folks that just don't live in the city. If providers invest in their bandwidth 100 percent then they should have a sayso about who uses it. If you don't like a provider it is easy to change today because of the new technology. We have several wireless providers that have purchased their 100mb pipe and then resells it to customers. I don't believe you are looking at the real issue. It is that If I pay I should be the one that determines how much I let you have vs someone else. It is my bandwidth and my investment. Not yours, and not the governments. Just a few years ago a T-1 cost over $500 per month. 1.5mb Now you can purchase 100mb for that same money and in some cities a full gigabit. Why would I want the government to mandate that i wouldn't be able to control who uses it. Right now I have the right to not sell a call center telephone lines on my network because they would use up the resources more than a normal business. We call it shaping. It keeps our system in balance so that we don't have to buy extra lines.

You do realize that internet providers are able to "own" anything BECAUSE of the federal government, right?
 
You do realize that internet providers are able to "own" anything BECAUSE of the federal government, right?
Is this the argument like you didn't build that statement? Our government built the internet with our money not their money. It is so easy to separate the government vs the people in a statement like that. Because of companies paying taxes the government built the internet. Actually the military did it. Also they made the interstate system, and your little iphone or android uses satellites that we paid for. We the people are the ones that paid for all that $hit. The government should work for the people and stay out of over regulation like net neutrality. The free market system catches the cheaters and they pay for it with their life.
 
Back
Top Bottom