Another point of view I found posted on another site:
_________
I've shared before that I worked in an emergency room for a couple of summers while I was in college. I've seen a lot of DV victims recant, some with and some without obvious injuries. Many who recanted were probably liars on the front end, getting their significant others in trouble as revenge for some perceived slight. But others accused, recanted, then explained their flip as some form of, "well, I can't really afford to lose him because he financially supports me, is the father of my kids," etc. At the very least, Taylor's accuser's credibility is now shot. Whether he did or didn't assault her, the chances he'd ever get prosecuted for an non-aggravated DV charge against that particular woman is pretty much nil going forward, and certainly nil for the purposes of this case.
Having said all that, let's assume for argument's sake that she was just a spiteful ol' thing and made up the whole story because she caught him looking at another woman. Do you bring Taylor back?
Hell, how can you not?
I've got a real problem with false accusations, and I'm sure I'm not alone. If we look at this strictly through the lens of the legal process, there's not a lot of justification for costing Taylor his Alabama career based upon a lie. You can make the argument that Alabama never should have signed him in the first place, but that's a different argument and doesn't apply here.
The wild card in this is no one knows what (if anything) was said when UA met with (if they even did meet with) Taylor following the arrest. I know if I had been falsely accused and knew that my career was about to end, you'd have to get me off the top of Denny Chimes, because I'd be up there with a megaphone proclaiming my innocence. I'd have nothing left to lose at that point. It's very possible that Saban asked him if he did it and he said, "I didn't do what she said I did, but yeah, we scrapped a little," and at that point, the answer to the do-you-bring-him-back argument doesn't depend on the actual case anymore.
But if we find out in the end that this was a total fabrication from the ground up, I can't find the argument to get rid of the guy once you've already decided you could take him in the first place.