šŸˆ Seniors getting another year of eligibility even if they play 10 games this season

TerryP

Successfully wasting your time since...
Staff
I've ran across a few tidbits the last 24 hours from a few that are saying the NCAA will make an announcement soon. How do they go from here? Just spitballing but it seems the most logical way to proceed is to bump the total to 110 for 2021 and slowly ween back to 85. Personally, I'e hoped we would see the 85 increased...may be another silver lining thing.
 
That would be really surprising for the teams playing ten games. I could see them doing something for those cancelling a season or perhaps for those who have a four-game spring season to compensate them for a lost season. I wouldn't give everyone 25 extra, I'd just grandfather the number who didn't declare for the draft.
 
I like the idea, but I also think these guys have to deal with the consequences of their decisions. They chose the school they wanted to attend, and now they are realizing they also need to understand the conference they decide to play for and the decisions they make. None of the current players could have envisioned this virus, but the Big Ten and Pac-12 have been known to stand a part and not always make the best decisions. It's eye opening and very well could change recruiting for some guys in the future. It's not going to kill Ohio State, but guys will think twice about other schools in those conferences. Fields, he deserves what he gets for playing the race card instead of manning up and admitting he couldn't beat out Fromm. His sister still plays softball at Georgia by the way, so the race situation must have really hit his family hard.
 
I like the idea, but I also think these guys have to deal with the consequences of their decisions. They chose the school they wanted to attend, and now they are realizing they also need to understand the conference they decide to play for and the decisions they make. None of the current players could have envisioned this virus, but the Big Ten and Pac-12 have been known to stand a part and not always make the best decisions. It's eye opening and very well could change recruiting for some guys in the future. It's not going to kill Ohio State, but guys will think twice about other schools in those conferences. Fields, he deserves what he gets for playing the race card instead of manning up and admitting he couldn't beat out Fromm. His sister still plays softball at Georgia by the way, so the race situation must have really hit his family hard.
Fair for Fields. Really not so for the big10 schools though. I doubt kids will use this decision in there college selection
 
Fields, he deserves what he gets for playing the race card instead of manning up and admitting he couldn't beat out Fromm. His sister still plays softball at Georgia by the way, so the race situation must have really hit his family hard.
Considering we saw Cade Mays leave UGA for UT (waiver denied by NCAA) citing the "toxic culture" at UGA as his reason...tends to shine a different light on Fields as well, in my opinion.
 
Considering we saw Cade Mays leave UGA for UT (waiver denied by NCAA) citing the "toxic culture" at UGA as his reason...tends to shine a different light on Fields as well, in my opinion.

Are we on the same page that with Mays it was probably more of not being coddled, as well as his family at Georgia? He was getting playing time if my memory serves me correctly.
 
Council OK's 12-hour plan, backs eligibility freeze



The NCAA's Division I council on Wednesday approved a 12-hour schedule model for teams not playing this fall that includes time for strength and conditioning, meetings, and five hours of on-field activities with helmets per week.

The council also recommended that all fall sports athletes be allowed to freeze their eligibility this season so that they won't lose it regardless of how many games they might participate in.

West Virginia athletic director Shane Lyons, the chair of the NCAA's Football Oversight Committee, said the athletes would have six years to use five years of eligibility, and it wouldn't matter if they decided to redshirt. The proposal has to be approved by the Division I board of directors, which meets on Friday afternoon.

No changes have been made to current transfer rules, and the eligibility recommendation doesn't impact transferring, Lyons said.

The 12-hour model is currently in place from Aug. 24 to Oct. 4, Lyons said, and the oversight committee will continue to consider what a practice will look like beyond that and present it to the Division I council again in September.

The plan approved Wednesday aims to provide some structure and continued practice time to several conferences that have decided to postpone their seasons to the spring in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, including the Big Ten, Pac-12, Mountain West and Mid-American conferences.

Lyons said the 12-hour rule was a compromise, and that the oversight committee felt 20 hours was too much in the fall, especially because the athletes hope to compete in the spring. Coaches can use the five hours of on-field activities at their discretion each week, meaning they can go one hour one day, and two hours another day if they want, but no contact is allowed.

The teams can't do 11-on-11 or 7-on-7 drills, but it can be more than a walk-through. Lyons pointed out that for the players who have had their seasons pushed back to the spring, it could be more than a year before they play an actual football game.

"You can go at a faster speed," Lyons said. "You can run your offensive scheme, you can run your defensive scheme, but it's not 11-on-11 and all that. Most of the schools will do what they did in the summer, they'll go through schemes and plays and stuff, but a lot of it will be individual drill work with your D-backs, your offensive line, defensive line."

Still, some coaches such as Penn State's James Franklin were looking for more time this fall.

"I don't agree at all with the 12 hours," Franklin said earlier Wednesday during his news conference. "That makes no sense that other teams are going to be having a season, and we're only going to get to work with our guys for 12 hours. You've got voting from basically all the different conferences, and right now, the only people voting in the best interests of the Big Ten are the people from the Big Ten."

Arizona State athletic director athletic director Ray Anderson called it a "good balance in terms of what people would like to do."

"I think it's a good compromise for those who say 20 hours, and those who say, no, 20 is too much, let's go back to eight," he said. "Folks can use it as their local health and safety policies and authorities allow you to do. We've got four of our Pac-12 teams -- Cal, Stanford, UCLA and USC -- who still can't even go indoors and use footballs because the health authorities as of [Tuesday] afternoon to my knowledge have not granted the ability to go inside and hold those types of exercises.

"It will depend on where each of the medical communities are depending on the spread," he said, "but I think 12 is an appropriate compromise that should allow everyone to accommodate what they need to do."
 
Quick observations:
1. I think its a great idea to give kids another year of eligibility.
2. Some kids will take advantage of the opportunity and others will not.
3. The extra year of eligibility will balance itself out over time.
4. I see more transfers than normal for that last year. Remember, the school has to want the prospective student athlete. For every Jalen Hurts you will have ten John Doe's.
5. I wonder if incoming freshmen will look at other schools a little more carefully if they think they are going to have to sit behind better players?
 
IF this were to happen... Seems like a long shot for the players that have actually played 4 years... But IF it were to happen, this would signal the clear shift of a P5 NCAA vs the others.

Most on this forum are aware of how little the majority athletic departments actually make. Adding scholarships isn't going to help the cause of athletic departments that were operating in the red BEFORE losing their asses... And now after losing their asses. And with Title IX, those scholarships are going to be added to softball, swimming and diving, etc? Seems crazy.

It would be interesting to see how that impacts recruiting. Would you want to go to say Miss St where they could sign 105 guys, or UAB were there's far less competition? Just food for thought... I'd just go to Alabama :)
 
IF this were to happen... Seems like a long shot for the players that have actually played 4 years... But IF it were to happen, this would signal the clear shift of a P5 NCAA vs the others.

Most on this forum are aware of how little the majority athletic departments actually make. Adding scholarships isn't going to help the cause of athletic departments that were operating in the red BEFORE losing their asses... And now after losing their asses. And with Title IX, those scholarships are going to be added to softball, swimming and diving, etc? Seems crazy.

It would be interesting to see how that impacts recruiting. Would you want to go to say Miss St where they could sign 105 guys, or UAB were there's far less competition? Just food for thought... I'd just go to Alabama :)

Exactly my question, can they afford more scholarships if guys came back and took them up on that offer. One would think a guy like Ben Davis would graciously accept that in efforts of getting another potential year of film if he gets out there this year. Maybe a McMillon as well.
 
Dellenger doesn't even bother to mention the SAF in this article. He doesn't know about it? No. It's called lazy, narrative driven 'reporting.'

Not surprised a LSU guy found a way to make it about ....

 
@TerryP Its Dellenger. He is a remora attached to the withered ballsack of an old tiger
I was listening to yesterday's College Football Live this morning and heard Lugs repeating the same little story: how can schools afford ... Greg echoed what Luginbill was ranting along about.

And again, nary a mention of the SAF. They (NCAA,) having already opened that pool for spring sports covering 2020-2021 will do the same if schools need assistance (which they'll find a way to show, I suspect.)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom