The Overseerers on the Democrat Plantation can’t have that.Let's consider this in closing. These people of color you're speaking of, shouldn't they have the right to choose how the abortion laws are written in their states of residence?
The Overseerers on the Democrat Plantation can’t have that.Let's consider this in closing. These people of color you're speaking of, shouldn't they have the right to choose how the abortion laws are written in their states of residence?
Or if sexism wasn’t so prevalentThis wouldn’t be a discussion if morality weren’t in the sewer in this country.
It’s not false premise, it’s men on Supreme Court who are overturning R v W, in LA and MS over 90% of the legislators are men, it’s men determining what women can and can’t do with their bodies. Not one of these states put their anti-abortion bills to a vote of the population, just like Florida, Texas, Wyoming, and every other right wing state that have these “trigger” bills & just like LA all of those states have a majority of men in their government.This is another false premise. You keep saying "men shouldn't" but disregard there are women who are in both house and senate positions in each state. These are the individuals who'll be making the laws in each state: duly elected, by both men and women. Since this is an Alabama site...you realize that there are more women in the state than men, right? It's the same way in 40 of the 50 states. The biggest variance is found in Alaska: 52% male.
If I understand what you're saying here, it doesn't matter if it's 12 weeks or nine months?
Can you cite the groups that are pushing this agenda? I don't mean citing a report suggesting there are such groups. I specifically mean point us to these groups and where they're stating that's their agenda.
Herein lies your rights, as a man, to exercise your civic duty. Vote for the individuals that believe as you. You firmly believe this way, voice your opinions through your votes.
You're only half right to start this narrative. Mississippi does have the most restrictive on record. LA isn't in the top five.
Mississippi's laws allow abortions up to 16 weeks. Also included in these laws are "triggers" that allow abortions if it threatens the mother's health or is a result of rape.
Here's where you have to be careful with wording. MS and LA are not the two states with the highest population of people of color. They have the highest percentage, yes. Texas, Florida, Georgia, New York, to name four, have higher numbers.
Let's consider this in closing. These people of color you're speaking of, shouldn't they have the right to choose how the abortion laws are written in their states of residence?
You mean the racist idiots on the rightThe Overseerers on the Democrat Plantation can’t have that.
You're fucking up this discussion.The Overseerers on the Democrat Plantation can’t have that.
And this doesn't help.You mean the racist idiots on the right
Because, as Matt aptly pointed out, you can't have discussion if it devolves into pedomorphic behavior.This has to be the most divisive topics in the United States
Your understanding of how a representative democracy functions is fatally flawed. Excellent democrat talking point repeatability but not the least bit grounded in the reality of how our system is supposed to work. Mob rule has never been our way until the blm/antifa summer.It’s not false premise, it’s men on Supreme Court who are overturning R v W, in LA and MS over 90% of the legislators are men, it’s men determining what women can and can’t do with their bodies. Not one of these states put their anti-abortion bills to a vote of the population, just like Florida, Texas, Wyoming, and every other right wing state that have these “trigger” bills & just like LA all of those states have a majority of men in their government.
No, what I’m saying is I’m fine with the cutoff being 12 weeks (if these states need to add antiabortion laws).
I always vote, but if the states don’t put their antiabortion crap up for a vote from the people then voting does no good.
LA’s “trigger” law is going to be the most restrictive when it passes.
Yes, these people should have a right to say how their abortion laws are written, but again none of those states put their antiabortion laws to a vote, they passed them in amongst themselves.
When you pass laws making abortions illegal you’re essentially saying “you must give birth”. They’re saying “you have to carry and give birth”…..not sure what else can be said out of “if you get an abortion it’s a felony” or “you get an abortion you’re getting arrested and have to go to court”
You're saying that about someone you've never met or talked with about this.Excuse me. Have your discussion with the libtard, nazi, groomer.
My apologiesYou're fucking up this discussion.
And this doesn't help.
Because, as Matt aptly pointed out, you can't have discussion if it devolves into pedomorphic behavior.
Problem is that pro-choice people generally would not agree to Europe's laws on it as too restrictive and too many on the other side are just no abortions ever. In the US it is almost abortion up to birth vs no abortion ever. There is little middle ground.Europe is rarely an example for the United States on matters of government, but a decent perspective here.
I saw a clip from Bill Maher's show where Europe, Germany, and a few other countries were brought up in his panel discussion. He mentioned not knowing these countries have stricter laws that those of the US, and also mentioned those laws came from the people's vote.Europe is rarely an example for the United States on matters of government, but a decent perspective here.
Opinion | Europe’s Abortion Lesson
How democracies compromised on the issue after political debate, not judicial fiat.www.wsj.com
Well, yeah, it's still a false premise from the beginning.It’s not false premise, it’s men on Supreme Court who are overturning R v W, in LA and MS over 90% of the legislators are men, it’s men determining what women can and can’t do with their bodies. Not one of these states put their anti-abortion bills to a vote of the population, just like Florida, Texas, Wyoming, and every other right wing state that have these “trigger” bills & just like LA all of those states have a majority of men in their government.
But these men have been voted into office by women who believe as they do. In both states you've mentioned more women have voted than men. It breaks down to where you'll find half of these women voters are child bearing age.I always vote, but if the states don’t put their antiabortion crap up for a vote from the people then voting does no good.
I've seen it suggested the cutoff be 22 weeks and that was based upon viability of babies born premature. I found it interesting that the general medical consensus a few years ago was 23 weeks. And just like every medical field we see they're advancing with saving those kids' lives.No, what I’m saying is I’m fine with the cutoff being 12 weeks (if these states need to add antiabortion laws).
The laws, state to state, generally don't reflect that "no abortion ever."Problem is that pro-choice people generally would not agree to Europe's laws on it as too restrictive and too many on the other side are just no abortions ever. In the US it is almost abortion up to birth vs no abortion ever. There is little middle ground.
Yet, the Democrats argue "abortion should be legal up to the moment of birth".The laws, state to state, generally don't reflect that "no abortion ever."
If that came up for a vote, how many states do you think would go to that extreme?
Are there bills up in any House around the states that's banning it outright?
It isn't the laws in this case but the arguments that happen between pro and anti people. To admit that an abortion can't happen after a certain time is an admission that it is a person at some point and to admit that abortion can ever happen is to admit life doesn't start at contraception. We have to change that to the real argument that is happening in every other country, when is too late.The laws, state to state, generally don't reflect that "no abortion ever."
If that came up for a vote, how many states do you think would go to that extreme?
Are there bills up in any House around the states that's banning it outright?
Which I'd think would be up for immediate appeal.States have tried to pass laws outright banning abortion but Roe v Wade was in the way. Eight states never removed their pre-Roe bans and those could start enforcement immediately if it were overturned.
Maybe. But without Roe it would be a new lawsuit and but really an appeal. I think the SC might take it up fast though.Which I'd think would be up for immediate appeal.
This is an argument repubs like to make about us. We don’t believe that at all (and those that do are very few).Yet, the Democrats argue "abortion should be legal up to the moment of birth".
This is an argument repubs like to make about us. We don’t believe that at all (and those that do are very few).