Adding one more note here and then off to other things for awhile ...
@psychojoe We talked about whether or not this was stemming from an investigation of ULL over on another forum. I truly believe it's linked though David Saunders but doesn't stop there. Ole Miss had their legal counsel involved with Saunders so the link there is undeniable.
They were there already (Oxford) and when the Tunsil thing broke it just gave the NCAA another chapter to be written on this whole ordeal. I want to use the term ancillary here but I'm not sure that fits.
ULL's investigation gave the NCAA grounds to go to Oxford. The NCAA had already received complaints about Ole Miss at the time and Saunders employment in Oxford opened the door for them to expand their investigation. The bottom line is this has been ongoing for quite some time.
Now, not only are the eyes of the collegiate football world focused on Ole Miss, the NCAA has their "probably cause" to investigate even further.
I'm of the same opinion today with Ole Miss as I was when USC was still being investigated and people were saying "nothing will happen."
This ain't over. (I'm of the understanding there's a good chance more allegations are coming.)
@psychojoe We talked about whether or not this was stemming from an investigation of ULL over on another forum. I truly believe it's linked though David Saunders but doesn't stop there. Ole Miss had their legal counsel involved with Saunders so the link there is undeniable.
āThrough the course of those interviews, it became apparent to (Louisiana-Lafayette associate director of athletics for academics and compliance Jessica) Lager that the enforcement staff was testing information that suggested Saunders knew of, or had been involved in, NCAA rules violations of an academic nature while employed at Ole Miss,ā the response added.
The investigation at Louisiana-Lafayette āarose out of a different investigation at another member institution,ā according to the Committee of Infractionsā report.
The Louisiana-Lafayette response to the NCAAās allegations asserted that āa pattern of violations ⦠trailed Saunders toā the school and that āit is evident that improper activity occurred in advance of (Louisiana-Lafayette) hiring.ā
Ole Miss investigation results in ULL penalties
Here's what I suspect:The investigation at Louisiana-Lafayette āarose out of a different investigation at another member institution,ā according to the Committee of Infractionsā report.
The Louisiana-Lafayette response to the NCAAās allegations asserted that āa pattern of violations ⦠trailed Saunders toā the school and that āit is evident that improper activity occurred in advance of (Louisiana-Lafayette) hiring.ā
Ole Miss investigation results in ULL penalties
They were there already (Oxford) and when the Tunsil thing broke it just gave the NCAA another chapter to be written on this whole ordeal. I want to use the term ancillary here but I'm not sure that fits.
ULL's investigation gave the NCAA grounds to go to Oxford. The NCAA had already received complaints about Ole Miss at the time and Saunders employment in Oxford opened the door for them to expand their investigation. The bottom line is this has been ongoing for quite some time.
Now, not only are the eyes of the collegiate football world focused on Ole Miss, the NCAA has their "probably cause" to investigate even further.
I'm of the same opinion today with Ole Miss as I was when USC was still being investigated and people were saying "nothing will happen."
This ain't over. (I'm of the understanding there's a good chance more allegations are coming.)