They never got to read the letter, they were just going off the BS that was fed to them by the OM AD. Most of them were local honks and then the national media just took it on face value that the local honks had actually done something they are supposed to do, investigative journalism.
Or by Freeze himself. That's the main reason
I posted these thoughts in this thread. In ESPN's latest article, they are quoting "Chris Low's sources." That would be source, and that would be Freeze.
I've seen more than a handful ask "why haven't they released the NOA if there's nothing there?" It's a pertinent question.
Now, I'm left thinking this ... considering how many times we've seen the story change over the last few weeks/months, why on earth would a reasonable person believe what Bjork is putting out there? He's "shaded" the truth more than once.
Bjork: NCAA says investigation into Ole Miss is over
________
On a side note: You guys remember all the talk from the Auburnites about Dre, and a few others, getting Chargers? The University has had a practice that they look into vehicles, titles, methods of payments, etc., for a long, long time. BUT, Ole Miss is just now...
Through it all, Bjork has remained steadfast in his defense of the athletic program he inherited only months before this all began in 2012. Bjork said Ole Miss has increased its compliance staff, started a vehicle monitoring program that traces the paperwork of athletesā cars and developed a āhigh-profile student-athlete programā to meet with those players on a regular basis.
One thing I've seen many ignore, or just fail to mention ...
As it's being reported there's no LOIC (Level 1 offense) included in the NOA. Now, if we assume that's the case, no one is mentioning the Level II equivalent, Failure to Monitor.